Abstract:Classical design procedures are less advantageous than performance-based seismic design (PBSD) of buildings, which is included in existing standards such as ASCE 41-23 for new buildings or retrofitting. PBSD requires accurate assessment of building seismic responses. Such assessments can be done using either faster nonlinear static procedures (NSPs) or more time-intensive nonlinear time-history analyses (NTHAs). However, the reliability of NSPs can be questionable, as shown by previous research. Practitioners need to conduct further investigations to determine safety margins and the applicability scope of these methods. This is especially important for irregular buildings and near-fault zones. This problem is investigated in this paper by first using 1250 single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems to evaluate the ASCE 41-23’s coefficient method and performing 25000 NTHAs for near- and far-fault records. Second, the responses obtained from two alternative approaches, the modal pushover analysis (MPA) and FEMA 440’s capacity spectrum method (CSM), are compared with NTHA responses for buildings with significant higher-mode effects. American standards are used to design 96 3D symmetric and asymmetric steel moment-resisting frame (MRF) buildings with different characteristics such as lateral, lateral-torsional, and torsional modes of vibration dominance as well as different stability conditions, which are considered in this paper. The MPA and CSM are compared with NTHAs in this paper. The results show that the ASCE 41-23’s coefficient method is unreliable for near-fault zones and that the MPA and CSM are unreliable for seismic evaluation of buildings with dominant lateral-torsional modes of vibration or significant P-Δ effects. The results also revealed that MPA is a conservative approach for seismic evaluation of torsionally dominant buildings while CSM is not.

Introduction of evaluation method of the seismic capacity of existing multistory RC buildings in Japan

Introduction of design method for RC structures under severe earthquake in Japan

Post-event evaluation of residual capacity of building structures based on seismic monitoring

Introduction of Technological Standard for Earthquake-resistant Calculation Method for Buildings Based on Energy Balance in Japan

Comparative study of seismic design method for reinforced concrete structures in China and Japan

STUDY ON THE COLLAPSE-RESISTANT CAPACITY OF RC FRAMES WITH DIFFERENT SEISMIC FORTIFICATION LEVELS

SEISMIC DAMAGE FIELD OBSERVATION AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS OF MULTILAYER REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURE

Seismic capacity evaluation of corroded reinforced concrete frame structures

A methodological approach for seismic performance of existing single-storey industrial RC precast facilities

"SYSTEM CAPACITY DESIGN METHOD" FOR THE SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDING STRUCTURES: A REVIEW

Assessment of Multi-Criteria Evaluation Procedures for Identification of Optimal Seismic Retrofitting Strategies for Existing RC Buildings

Experimental Study on Aseismic Performance of a Full-Scale Multi-Story Residential Building of CTSRC Structure

COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN OF HIGH-RISE RC FRAME-CORE TUBE STRUCTURE BETWEEN CHINA AND AMERICA

Seismic Reinforcement Effect and Vibration Test of Externally Attached Substructures in a Selected Japan School Building

Seismic Risk Assessment and Rehabilitation Method of Existing RCC Structures Using Micro Concrete

A Critical Evaluation of the Coefficient Method, Capacity Spectrum Method and Modal Pushover Analysis for Irregular Steel Buildings in Seismic Zones

A Simplified Method for Quantifying the Progressive Collapse Fragility of Multi-Story RC Frames in China

Seismic loss comparison of typical high-rise buildings in China and USA using the new-generation performance-based design method

A Machine-Learning-Based Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Approach for Low-Rise RC Buildings

A Preliminary Comparison of the Seismic Design of Tall RC Frame-Core Tube Structures between China and the United States

Examination on some seismic damage prediction methods for multistory masonry buildings