Abstract:Many scholars attach importance to the dissension of dual real estate transaction in different countries. The solution to this problem involves some different fields in civil law. Owing to the not-quite-the-same basic principles adopted by the different countries in civil law, some inevasible diversity exists between the law theory structures that are taken in dissension solution. However, this diversity is just because different countries want to maintain the coherence in its own law theory system. Instead of hypostatic difference, there exists certain commonness between different countries when they take the essential value judgment in settling the dissension. Altogether, the core value judgment in this problem is that law should be expected in what area to respect and to protect the free competition right of the second buyer.According to the German law, the French law and the Japanese law, and the experience of comparative law, generally the efficacy of the Second Contract which is a breach of morality can’t be protected by the law. And to judge whether the behavior of the second buyer is a breach of morality becomes the key to the settlement of the dissension. The judgment of breach of morality is not only affected by the registration system, but also closely related to the actual possession of estate. Notwithstanding, the provisional registration system for the transfer of real property established in the Property Law of the People’s Republic of China has some precautionary effect, but it can’t prevent the dual real estate transaction completely. Therefore, in judicial practice, we should set up a balancing of interest system which is based on the provisional registration for the transfer of real property to settle the dissension.Superficially, this paper is just talking about the value judgment in dual real estate transaction dissension. In fact, however, the core judgment of this problem is closely connected with the meaning of estate public announcement system. Consequently, the value judgment system discussed in the paper can also be used in other types of dissension in the transfer of title.After the adoption of the Property Law of China, some correlative theory structure has been established. The next research emphases should be to explain and apply the articles of the Property Law correctly. And the establishment of balancing of interest system is more important to the application of the Law.

The Discrimination Between Substantive Claim and Procedural Claim:From the Perspective of Claim of Property Confirmation

On Claims in rem Based on Possession:Theoretical Reception in Substance and Procedure

The Summary of Studies on Juristic Character of Main Types of Transference of Rural Land Contract and Operation Rights

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

Presumption of Right:between Substantial Law and Procedural Law

Claim of Right in Rem and the Application of Action Limitation

Does Non Liquet Status Exist in System of Proof in China's Civil Procedure?

On the Protection of Procedural Interests

The Function and Procedure of the Civil Public Interests Litigation

Action Filed by a Third Person on the Subject Matter of Enforcement

Extension of the Scope of Judgment Personas:Centering on Transfer of Substantive Right and Acquisition of Enforcement Rights

A Native Way of Partial Requisition

On the Differentiation of Civil Judicature and Administrative Procedure in the Trail of Knowledge Property Proprietary Cases

The Equity of the Conflict of Interest in Dual Real Estate Transaction

The Relationship between the Theory of Juristic Act of Real Right and the Distinguishing Principle in Property Law

The Different Logic Composition of Dominion and Claim in Civil Law

Legal Theory of Multiple Transaction for Special Movable Properties——Commenting onArticle 10 of the Judicial Interpretation of Contract of Sales by Supreme People’s Court

Presumptive Correctness of Real Estate Register

Context Analysis of the "value Substance, Devalue Procedure" Thesis: on the Problem of Procedural Justice Incidentally

Civil Procedural Duties System in the Modern Society: A Research on the Different Roles of Judges and Parties in Clarifying Facts of Cases

On the Effect of Judged Facts