Abstract:BackgroundMembers of the genus Bifidobacterium are anaerobic Gram-positive Actinobacteria, which are natural inhabitants of human and animal gastrointestinal tract. Certain bifidobacteria are frequently used as food additives and probiotic pharmaceuticals, because of their various health-promoting properties.Due to the enormous demand on probiotic bacteria, manufacture of high-quality products containing living microorganisms requires rapid and accurate identification of specific bacteria. Additionally, isolation of new industrial bacteria from various environments may lead to multiple isolations of the same strain, therefore, it is important to apply rapid, low-cost and effective procedures differentiating bifidobacteria at the intra-species level. The identification of new isolates using microbiological and biochemical methods is difficult, but the accurate characterization of isolated strains may be achieved using a polyphasic approach that includes classical phenotypic methods and molecular procedures. However, some of these procedures are time-consuming and cumbersome, particularly when a large group of new isolates is typed, while some other approaches may have too low discriminatory power to distinguish closely related isolates obtained from similar sources.ResultsThis work presents the evaluation of the discriminatory power of four molecular methods (ARDRA, RAPD-PCR, rep-PCR and SDS-PAGE fingerprinting) that are extensively used for fast differentiation of bifidobacteria up to the strain level. Our experiments included 17 reference strains and showed that in comparison to ARDRA, genotypic fingerprinting procedures (RAPD and rep-PCR) seemed to be less reproducible, however, they allowed to differentiate the tested microorganisms even at the intra-species level. In general, RAPD and rep-PCR have similar discriminatory power, though, in some instances more than one oligonucleotide needs to be used in random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Moreover, the results also demonstrated a high discriminatory power of SDS-PAGE fingerprinting of whole-cell proteins. On the other hand, the protein profiles obtained were rather complex, and therefore, difficult to analyze.ConclusionsAmong the tested procedures, rep-PCR proved to be the most effective and reliable method allowing rapid differentiation of Bifidobacterium strains. Additionally, the use of the BOXA1R primer in the differentiation of 21 Bifidobacterium strains, newly isolated from infant feces, demonstrated slightly better discriminatory power in comparison to PCR reactions with the (GTG)5 oligonucleotide. Thus, BOX-PCR turned out to be the most appropriate and convenient molecular technique in differentiating Bifidobacterium strains at all taxonomic levels.

Comparison of Four Methods for Differentiation of Enterococcus Faecalis and Enterococcus Faecium

Study on the Bacterial Identification Using 16S-23S Rrna Gene Spacer Regions

Comparison of Different Methods for Identification of Pathogenic Bacteria from Rice

Comparation of Three Methods for Studying Microbial Diversity of Farmland Soil

Comparison of molecular techniques with other methods for identification and enumeration of probiotics in fermented milk products

Comparison of Two Rapid Bacteria Strain Identification Methods

Comparison of the Multiple Platforms to Identify Various Aeromonas Species

Comparison of various molecular methods for rapid differentiation of intestinal bifidobacteria at the species, subspecies and strain level

Evaluation of phenotypic characteristics for differentiation of enterococcal species using an example based algorithm

Identification of a lactic acid bacteria strain from traditional dairy products

Comparison of Five DNA Extraction Methods for Identification of Two Species Normally Caused Nosocomial Infection by Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus Polymerase Chain Reaction

PCR-DGGE Analysis of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Fermentation Characteristics of Strains Isolated from Dairy Fan

[Molecular Diagnosis of the Specific DNA Patterns of 16S-23S Rrna Gene of Bacteria].

Rapid differentiation among Lactobacillus, Pediococcus and Weissella species from some Nigerian indigenous fermented foods

The comparison among three microbial methods for detecting β-lactams in milk

Comparison of Three Methods on Relatedness Analysis of Acinetobacter Baumannii Strains from Hospital Infection

Comparison between API and 16S rRNA to identifycorynebacterium

Diversity and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Chinese Traditional Foods

Development of Two Molecular Approaches for Differentiation of Clinically Relevant Yeast Species Closely Related to Candida Guilliermondii and Candida Famata

Comparison of Two Pcr-Based Genetic Fingerprinting Methods for Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Saccharomyces Strains

Comparison of Methods for Measuring Viable E. Coli Cells During Cultivation: Great Differences in the Early and Late Exponential Growth Phases.