Effects of Different Ways of Liver Transplantation on Hemodynamics

PENG Zhang-long,LU Zhi-jun,WANG Hai-bin,WANG Ying,GU Min-jie,QU Dong-mei,LUO Yan,YU Bu-wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2006.06.024
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of different ways of liver transplantation on hemodynamics.Methods Eighty-six patients undergoing elective liver transplantation were divided into three groups according to the ways of surgery: group A received standard classic liver transplantation(38 cases),group B received modified classic liver transplantation(12 cases) and group C received piggyback liver transplantation(36 cases).Left radial artery and right femoral vein were catheterized to continuously monitor mean artery pressure(MAP) and inferior vena cava pressure(IVCP).Right internal jugular vein was inserted Swan-Ganz catheter to continuously monitor central venous pressure(CVP),mean pulmonary artery pressure(MPAP),cardiac index(CI),systemic vascular resistance(SVR) and pulmonary vascular resistance(PVR). Results There were no significant differences in hemodynamics among the three groups before anheptic period.During anhepatic period,HR,SVR and PVR increased,while CI decreased,and MAP maintained stable in three groups. CVP decreased and ICVP increased in three groups,but the changes in group A and B were much greater than those in group C(P<0.01).At the beginning of neohepatic period,the incidence of reperfusion syndrome was 34.2%,16.7% and 25.0%,respectively.MAP and CI were much lower and CVP was much higher in group A than those in group B and C(P<0.05).At 5 min of neohepatic period,there were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters apart from that CI in group A was still much lower than that in group B and C(P<0.05). Conclusion Standard classic liver transplantation has the most effect on hemodynamics,while modified classic liver transplantation has the least.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?