Effects of Different Ways of Orthotopic Liver Transplantation without Venovenous Bypass on Anesthetic Management

Zhao Yan,Jiang Jianyu,Zhang Liping,Zhang L
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2008.01.004
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effects of piggyback and classic orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) without venovenous bypass on anesthetic management. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on the clinical data of 50 cases of OLT without venovenous bypass performed from November 2003 to December 2006, including 25 piggyback (group A) and 25 classic (group B) OLT. The perioperative hemodynamics, hemostatic conditions, hepatic and renal functions, changes of internal environment, and fluid therapy were compared between the two groups. Results At the beginning of anhepatic stage, the mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), and cardiac index (CI) in the group A were significantly higher than those in the group B [MAP: (68±6) mm Hg vs (64±5) mm Hg; t=2.561, P=0.014. CVP: (5.4±3.3) mm Hg vs (3.5±2.3) mm Hg; t=2.362, P=0.022. CI: (3.7±0.8) L· min-1· m-2 vs (3.2±0.6) L· min-1· m-2;t=2.500, P= 0.016]. At the beginning of neohepatic phase, the MAP in the group A was significantly higher than that in the group B [(66±6) mm Hg vs (62±5) mm Hg; t=2.561,P=0.014], while the CVP was similar between the two groups [(8.4±4.0) mm Hg vs (10.6±4.2) mm Hg; t=-1.897,P=0.064]. The morbidity rate of reperfusion syndrome in the group A was significantly lower than that in the group B (8.0% vs 32.0%, χ2=4.500, P=0.034).At the early neohepatic stage, the blood pH and base excess (BE) values in the group A were significantly higher than those in the group B [pH: 7.34±0.05 vs 7.31±0.04; t=2.343, P=0.023. BE: (-4.9±2.3) mmol /L vs (-6.3±2.3) mmol /L; t=2.152, P=0.036].No significant differences were detected in the hemostatic states, hepatic and renal functions, intraoperative blood loss, urine output, fluid replacement, and component transfusion during OLT between the two groups (P>0.05). The requirement of vasoactive drugs in the group A was significantly smaller than that in the group B (P<0.05). Conclusions The hemodynamics and acid-base balance are relatively stable in the piggyback OLT compared to the classic OLT without venovenous bypass. Monitoring and regulation of hemodynamics, internal environment, coagulation state, hepatic and renal functions, and fluid administration should be emphasized during the OLT by using both the techniques.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?