COMPARISON OF EFFECTS BETWEEN NAFEEDTA AND FESO4 FOR IRON DEFICIENCY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF CONTROLLED TRIALS

王波,詹思延,夏愔愔,李立明
2011-01-01
Abstract:[Objective]To compare effects between NaFeEDTA and FeSO4 for iron deficiency.[Methods]A comprehensive literature retrieval was performed via searching electronic databases,hand searching bibliographies of books and relevant journals,looking into conference abstracts,contacting fields experts and reviewing references and citations.Criteria from Cochrane EPOC review group were used to assess the quality of included studies.Generic inverse variance method was used to undertake meta-analysis.[Results]2 controlled before and after studies met the inclusion criteria.Meta analysis found comparing with FeSO4,NaFeEDTA group had higher hemoglobin level(weighted mean difference 7.01 g/L,95%CI 3.57-10.45;P﹤0.000 1)and lower prevalence rate of iron deficiency anemia(rate difference-26%,95% CI-44%--8%;P=0.004).[Conclusion]The effect of NaFeEDTA for iron deficiency is probably better than FeSO4,while randomized controlled trials are needed to provide stronger evidence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?