Abstract:Environmental impact assessment (EIA) system has been established in China since 1973. In present EIA cases, there are four participants in general: governments, enterprises, EIA organizations and the public. The public has held responsible for both social costs and social duties. The public supervises social costs produced by enterprises discharging pollutant in EIA. However public participation is mostly deputized by governments, which severely weaken the independence of the public as one participant in EIA. In this paper, EIA refers to the different attitudes of the participants whose optional strategies may be described by a proper game model. According to disfigurements in EIA, three sides (governments, enterprises, and EIA organizations) dynamic iterative game theory, dynamic game theory of incomplete information, and perfect Bayesian equilibrium theory to analyze the reciprocity relation among governments, EIA organizations and enterprises. The results show that in a short period, economic benefit is preponderant over social benefit. Governments and enterprises both do not want to take EIA to reveal social costs. EIA organizations’ income comes from enterprises and the collusions are built between them to vindicate economic benefit. In a long run, social benefit loss caused by environmental pollution must be recuperated sooner or later and environmental deterioration will influence the achievements of economic benefit, so both governments and enterprises are certain to pursue high social benefit and willing to take EIA, helpful to increase private benefit. EIA organizations will make fair assessment when their economic benefit are ensured. At present, the public as silent victims can not take actual part in EIA. The EIA system must be improved to break the present equilibrium of three sides, bringing the public to the equilibrium to exert public supervision.

Structural environmental problems:Structural dilemma of environmental assessment in China

[Environmental Damage Assessment: International Regulations and Revelation to China].

Research on the Construction of Integrated System Ofenvironmental Economic Accounting in China

MARKET FAILURE, GOVERNMENT SHORTCOMING AND EXCESSTVE EXPANDING OF LAND- USE SCALES IN CHINA'S CITY

Spatially Resolved Risk Assessment of Environmental Incidents in China

Finding Structural Imbalance: A Theoretical Explanation to the Failure of China's Environmental Regulations

Analysis of Multi-Stage and Dynamic Incomplete Information Game Model for EIA System in China

STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN CHINA: OPPORTUNITIES, ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

The Problems and Countermeasures of Strategic Environmental Assessment in China:Based on Institution Construction

Practice of strategic environmental assessment in Xiamen, China

Game Theoretic Analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment System in China

Problems and counter measures of some standards in environmental impact assessment

Probe into the Framework for Environmental Risk Assessment

Design on China's Environmental Administrative System with the Context of the Externality Theory

Environmental Performance Assessment in China and Hong Kong

Problems and Solutions of Implementing Plan Environmental Impact Assessment in China

Studies On Strategic Environmental Assessment In China -Implementation And Effectiveness

Environmental Economic Impact Assessment in China: Problems and Prospects

Assessing the Administrative Practice of Environmental Protection Performance Evaluation in China: the Case of Shenzhen

Strategic Environmental Assessment:A New Tool for Ecological Urbanization of Coastal Cities in China

Structural Analysis on Factors Affecting Water Resource System