Three Unidentified Issues on Hu Shih’s Plan of Literary Reform

DUAN Huai-qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2007.03.013
2007-01-01
Abstract:How do we interpret the Western context or Chinese context resulting in Hu Shih’s new literary thoughts? For further researches, we should make sure what role the two contexts mentioned above play in boosting Hu Shih’s advocating ideas for a literary reform and literary revolution during the New Literary and New Cultural Movement and what relationship the two contexts obtained. The two contexts and the discourses resulting from the contexts had once been regarded as ″Westernization″ and ″cultural nationalism″ in the narrative context of the history of the May Fourth New Cultural Movement. The former attached more importance to the Western background of the May Fourth New Culture, while the latter focused on its Chinese source and origin. Therefore, Hu Shih himself gradually developed his own narrative discourses of the literary history of ″the Renaissance of Chinese literature and Art″. In this set of discourses, Hu Shih thought of the May Fourth New Literary and Cultural Movement as a renaissance of literature, art and thought which was similar to the Western Renaissance. Furthermore, Hu Shih regarded the May Fourth New Cultural Movement as a short phase in the modern time which was only a chain in the Chinese renaissance of the millennium. Moreover, with the elapse of the May Fourth New Literary and Cultural Movement, Hu Shih laid more emphasis on the traditional Chinese context when he interpreted the tradition. After further researches, we can find that the closer Hu Shih was in time to the May Fourth Movement, the more obvious were the Western ingredients in Hu Shih’s new literary thoughts. In addition, he even proposed that the description of the Chinese modern characteristics should be Westernized and fully globalized. The central idea Hu Shih advocated for the literary reform was the necessity of Western ingredients. The idea was not only expressed in his essay Literary Reform but also completely indicated in the development of his cultural ideas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?