Abstract:In the early 1970s, we and others in the economics profession became enamored with the notion of externalties—a cost or benefit imposed on or provided to others but not taken into account by the economic agents who generate the effect. We, and others, seemed to see external effects everywhere. There was polluted water and air, noise, urban blight, traffic congestion, and other features of modern life that seemed to call out for some form of corrective action. As the externalities revolution unfolded, economists and other social scientists overlooked the importance of evolved legal and other institutions that formally and informally establish property and liability rules that cause decision makers to face the cost of their actions, including what otherwise could be external costs imposed on unwilling third parties. While markets seemed always to fail, political institutions were seen systematically as without blemish, or so it seemed. It was this two-pronged failure, 1) a failure to consider and state assumptions about background institutional arrangements and 2) a disregard for special interest politics, that became the Achilles Heel of the otherwise elegant externality arguments. Eventually, it was the modern institutionalists, scholars who focused on laws, regulation, and rules of the marketplace, who attempted to close the lid and drive the nails on the externality coffin. In this paper, we reach back to 1920 and trace the rise and decline of the policy importance of externalities theory. Beginning with A. C. Pigou and Alfred Marshall, our story includes some of the great figures in economic history of thought. But while theory was being built, institutions were overlooked. Pigou continues to be a dominant player in the story until the 1960s and 1970s when externalities theory was challenged by James M. Buchanan, Ronald Coase and other scholars. It is here in the twilight years of the externalities revolution that the prospects of government failure are raised as being more daunting than the likelihood of market failure. Finally, in the late 1970s and beyond, the externalities revolution is replaced by a property rights revolution.

A Sign of British Decline: The End of Laissez-Faire

The Fate of Classics: Taking "The Wealth of Nations" as the Example

Passivation of Ideas:The British Orientation of Modern Chinese Political Ideas

The Rise and Dissolution of the British Empire’s Discourse Hegemony

Interpreting ''Liberty'': An Analysis Of The History Of Ideas

The Final Splendour Of An Aged Empire: Chinese Thought On International Law In The Early Twentieth Century

Peaceful Diplomacy and European Balance of Power——British Foreign Policies During Viscount Castlereagh and George Canning

The State Strikes Back: the end of economic reform in China? by Nicholas R. Lardy

Australian External Policy and the End of Britain's Empire1

Neo-liberalism and International Economic Law

The New Liberals and Chinese Civilization: Idealist Philosophy, Evolutionary Sociology, and the Quest for a Humanitarian Ethics in Edwardian Britain

The Demise of Globalization and Rise of Industrial Policy: Caveat Emptor

Why Liberalism Persists: The Neglected Life of the Law in the Story of Liberalism's Decline

The Emergence of Liberalism in China and Its Significance in the Period of after World War Ⅱ

Gentry Benevolence or Pursuit of Self-interest:The End of the Sino-British Opium Trade

The Late Qing Dynasty Diplomatic Transformation: Analysis from an Ideational Perspective

The Economic and Trade Relations Between China and the United Kingdom: Their Past, Present and Future

The Conservative Trend of British Politics During French Revolution

THE END OF THE EXTERNALITY REVOLUTION

The Trusteeship of Liberal Imperialism:Views on Asia and Africa from Edmund Burke and J.A.Hobson

A Paradox of Democratization:British Parliamentary Electoral System Reform