Abstract:Background: Evaluating outcome reliability is critical in real-world evidence studies. Overall survival is a common outcome in these studies; however, its capture in real-world data (RWD) sources is often incomplete and supplemented with linked mortality information from external sources. Conflicting recommendations exist for censoring overall survival in real-world evidence studies. This simulation study aimed to understand the impact of different censoring methods on estimating median survival and log hazard ratios when external mortality information is partially captured. Methods: We used Monte Carlo simulation to emulate a non-randomized comparative effectiveness study of two treatments with RWD from electronic health records and linked external mortality data. We simulated the time to death, the time to last database activity, and the time to data cutoff. Death events after the last database activity were attributed to linked external mortality data and randomly set to missing to reflect the sensitivity of contemporary real-world data sources. Two censoring schemes were evaluated: (1) censoring at the last activity date and (2) censoring at the end of data availability (data cutoff) without an observed death. We assessed the performance of each method in estimating median survival and log hazard ratios using bias, coverage, variance, and rejection rate under varying amounts of incomplete mortality information and varying treatment effects, length of follow-up, and sample size. Results: When mortality information was fully captured, median survival estimates were unbiased when censoring at data cutoff and underestimated when censoring at the last activity. When linked mortality information was missing, censoring at the last activity date underestimated the median survival, while censoring at the data cutoff overestimated it. As missing linked mortality information increased, bias decreased when censoring at the last activity date and increased when censoring at data cutoff. Conclusions: Researchers should consider the completeness of linked external mortality information when choosing how to censor the analysis of overall survival using RWD. Substantial bias in median survival estimates can occur if an inappropriate censoring scheme is selected. We advocate for RWD providers to perform validation studies of their mortality data and publish their findings to inform methodological decisions better.

The Effect of Sample Size and Censoring Proportion on the Power and Bias of Survival Analysis Models

Modified Cox Models: A Simulation Study on Different Survival Distributions, Censoring Rates, and Sample Sizes

Effect of difference censored rates between groups in clinical trails

Sample size determination for semiparametric analysis of current status data

Optimal subsampling for the Cox proportional hazards model with massive survival data

Power and sample size calculation for the additive hazard model

An empirical comparison between gradient boosting methods and cox's proportional hazards model for right-censored survival data

Random Weighting Method for Cox’s Proportional Hazards Model

Improving Estimation Efficiency of Cox Model via Using Other Related Survival Data

Copula-based Semiparametric Nonnormal Transformed Linear Model for Survival Data with Dependent Censoring

Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression in survival analysis: statistical standard and guideline of Life Cycle Committee

Optimal subsampling for parametric accelerated failure time models with massive survival data

An optimal subsampling design for large-scale Cox model with censored data

Sample size calculation for studies with grouped survival data

Power and Sample Size for Dose-Finding Studies with Survival Endpoints under Model Uncertainty.

The impact of different censoring methods for analyzing survival using real-world data with linked mortality information: a simulation study

A General Theory on Stochastic Curtailment for Censored Survival Data

An Online Updating Approach for Testing the Proportional Hazards Assumption with Streams of Survival Data

Strategies for power calculations in predictive biomarker studies in survival data

Comparison of Mediation Analysis Methods for Survival Outcome with Multiple Mediators

SURVIVAL ANALYSIS IN PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH