Abstract:BACKGROUND:Sample size planning for longitudinal data is crucial when designing mediation studies because sufficient statistical power is not only required in grant applications and peer-reviewed publications, but is essential to reliable research results. However, sample size determination is not straightforward for mediation analysis of longitudinal design.METHODS:To facilitate planning the sample size for longitudinal mediation studies with a multilevel mediation model, this article provides the sample size required to achieve 80% power by simulations under various sizes of the mediation effect, within-subject correlations and numbers of repeated measures. The sample size calculation is based on three commonly used mediation tests: Sobel's method, distribution of product method and the bootstrap method.RESULTS:Among the three methods of testing the mediation effects, Sobel's method required the largest sample size to achieve 80% power. Bootstrapping and the distribution of the product method performed similarly and were more powerful than Sobel's method, as reflected by the relatively smaller sample sizes. For all three methods, the sample size required to achieve 80% power depended on the value of the ICC (i.e., within-subject correlation). A larger value of ICC typically required a larger sample size to achieve 80% power. Simulation results also illustrated the advantage of the longitudinal study design. The sample size tables for most encountered scenarios in practice have also been published for convenient use.CONCLUSIONS:Extensive simulations study showed that the distribution of the product method and bootstrapping method have superior performance to the Sobel's method, but the product method was recommended to use in practice in terms of less computation time load compared to the bootstrapping method. A R package has been developed for the product method of sample size determination in mediation longitudinal study design.

Comparison of Mediation Analysis Methods for Survival Outcome with Multiple Mediators

Evaluation of Mediation Analysis Methods in Survival Data

Mediation Analysis for Censored Survival Data Under an Accelerated Failure Time Model

Comparison of Effect Size Measures for Mediation Analysis of Survival Outcomes with Application to the Framingham Heart Study

Mediation analysis with causally ordered mediators using Cox proportional hazards model

Comparison of methods for mediation analysis with multiple correlated mediators

Heterogeneous Mediation Analysis for Cox Proportional Hazards Model With Multiple Mediators

Sample Size Determination for Mediation Analysis of Longitudinal Data.

Causal Mediation Analysis in the Context of Clinical Research.

Causal mediation analysis for survival outcome with unobserved mediator-outcome confounders

Multiple mediation analysis with survival outcomes: With an application to explore racial disparity in breast cancer survival

Time-dependent mediators in survival analysis: Modelling direct and indirect effects with the additive hazards model

Mediation analysis for survival data with high-dimensional mediators

Causal Mediation Analysis with Sure Outcomes of Random Events Model

Mediation pathway selection with unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding

Statistical Mediation Analysis for Models with a Binary Mediator and a Binary Outcome: the Differences Between Causal and Traditional Mediation Analysis

Latent Class Dynamic Mediation Model with Application to Smoking Cessation Data

Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Treatments and Latent Confounders

Post-selection inference for high-dimensional mediation analysis with survival outcomes

Causal Mediation Analysis With a Binary Outcome and Multiple Continuous or Ordinal Mediators: Simulations and Application to an Alcohol Intervention

Causal Mediation Analysis in the Multilevel Intervention and Multicomponent Mediator Case