Abstract:In the early years of the New Period, along with the constant improvement of the social and political environment, the contestations among the exponents in the academic circles became lively; the viewpoint that (″literature) is a special ideology″ was also hotly debated. In the beginning of 1988, Luan Changda and Dong Xuewen began to query about the essentiality of ideology, and brought a severe concussion to the concept of essentiality of literary ideology which was considered as the standard till that time, that triggered the contestation concerning the relationship between ideology and literature among the academic circles, which lasted for several years. The question whether the literature's true nature consists in ideology became the core proposition of the contestation. The essentiality of ideology recovered its predominant position in the contestation, and the scholars had sufficient and fruitful discussions on the definition of the basic concept of the ideology, the relationship between the literature and ideology, the dialectical relationship between the essentiality of literary ideology and the non-literary ideology, and the aesthetical ideology of literature etc. The fundamental premise of the deep probing into in the literary ideology is to understand correctly the original idea of the classic writers of Marxism and to clarify the ideology and its related concepts. As Lu Meilin said that too narrow or too broad interpretation of the connotation of the ideology is one of the main reasons that caused the disorder in the field of literature theories, and he pointed out that ideology is a concept about the whole organism of composing factors. Many scholars, such as Zhang Shouying, Bian Pingshu, and Li Sixiao, are interested in the composing factors of ideology. While they focused on the analysis of the concept of ideology, scholars like Feng Yi and Huang Lizhi adhered to the essentiality of ideology and launched the in-depth discussion on the relationship between the main role of literature and the nature of ideology. In the 1980s, scholars including Qian Zhongwen, Tong Qingbing and Wang Yuanxiang, deliberated on the aesthetical ideology and the aesthetical theory of reflection. In the field of the aesthetical ideology, they made a systematic and in-depth investigation on the nature of literature, successfully resolved the conflict between the literary ideology and the aesthetical consciousness, and opened a new window for us to understand the correlative contradictions between the form and the contents, the emotion and the reason, expression and representation, humanity and the class nature. Although there is a limitation in its failure to explain efficiently how to achieve the harmony between aesthetical consciousness and the ideological factors of literature, the aesthetical ideology transcended the bondage of pure epistemology, and fitted a dialectical link between the literary ideology and the aesthetical factors, and in this way enriched and developed the Marxist viewpoint on the nature of literature. In conclusion, when we affirm that the innate nature of literature consists in the ideology, we must know that literature also contains some non-ideological factors, and in order to prevent the tendency of simplicity and philistinism in the field of literary studies and to cognize the scientific literary phenomena, it is very important to penetrate into these non-ideological factors.

Linguistics Poetics and the Revival of Rhetoric(Symposium)

Linguistic Poetics in Russian Philological Studies

The linguistic turn and the transformation of the twentieth-century literary theory in the West

Two Trends of Contemporary Literary Theory Study and Two Deep Changes of the Linguistic Turn

Lost and Found in Transnation: Modern Conceptualization of Chinese Rhetoric

From Literary Rules to Cultural Criticism- On Zhou Xian’s Literary and Academic Thoughts

After and Beyond "Polyphony","Dialogism","Carnivalesque"——New Progress in Bakhtin Research in China

Perspective on the Study of Essentiality of Literary Ideology

Ideas on the Current Construction of Literary Theory

A Study on the Historical Interactions Between Literature and Linguistics

Of Classic Western Poetics

Historical Reglection on Ancient Literary Theory and Contemporary Construction of the Poetic Space——and On the Creative Logic of the Poetic Spfitce of the Ancient Literary Theory

Reinterpretation on Poetics:Aristotle’s Philosophical Manner of Reasoning

Constructing Contemporary Chinese Literary and art Theory (Symposium II)

Thinking Upon Poetics: On the Poetic Feature of Art

Discourse Phenomena and Literary and Artistic Aesthetics

Sharper Distinctions for Debates over »Realism« in German Literature and Theater

Zhouyi and Reception Aesthetics

The Linguistic Turn of Ontological Investigation:A Comment on the Approaches of Analytical Philosophy

Literary Theory, Theory, and Post-Theory

Aesthetics and Literary Theory:Reflection on Some Popular Ideas