Abstract:Abstract The Noah‐MP land surface model (LSM) relies on the Monin‐Obukhov (M‐O) Similarity Theory (MOST) to calculate land‐atmosphere exchanges of water, energy, and momentum fluxes. However, MOST flux‐profile relationships neglect canopy‐induced turbulence in the roughness sublayer (RSL) and parameterize within‐canopy turbulence in an ad hoc manner. We implement a new physics scheme (M‐O‐RSL) into Noah‐MP that explicitly parameterizes turbulence in RSL. We compare Noah‐MP simulations employing the M‐O‐RSL scheme (M‐O‐RSL simulations) and the default M‐O scheme (M‐O simulations) against observations obtained from 647 Snow Telemetry (SNOTEL) stations and two AmeriFlux stations in the western United States. M‐O‐RSL simulations of snow water equivalent (SWE) outperform M‐O simulations over 64% and 69% of SNOTEL sites in terms of root‐mean‐square‐error (RMSE) and correlation, respectively. The largest improvements in skill for M‐O‐RSL occur over closed shrubland sites, and the largest degradations in skill occur over deciduous broadleaf forest sites. Differences between M‐O and M‐O‐RSL simulated snowpack are primarily attributable to differences in aerodynamic conductance for heat underneath the canopy top, which modulates sensible heat flux. Differences between M‐O and M‐O‐RSL within‐canopy and below‐canopy sensible heat fluxes affect the amount of heat transported into snowpack and hence change snowmelt when temperatures are close to or above the melting point. The surface energy budget analysis over two AmeriFlux stations shows that differences between M‐O and M‐O‐RSL simulations can be smaller than other model biases (e.g., surface albedo). We intend for the M‐O‐RSL physics scheme to improve performance and uncertainty estimates in weather and hydrological applications that rely on Noah‐MP.Plain Language Summary Most widely used computer models of the land surface neglect canopy‐induced turbulence in calculations of heat, water, and momentum exchanges. Accounting for canopy‐induced turbulence is important because coherent eddies that form near the canopy top are responsible for generating most of the transportation of heat, water, and momentum, in and directly above the canopy. In 2007, 2008 scientists Ian N. Harman and John J. Finnigan developed a methodology that adapts contemporarily used equations in operational LSMs to account for canopy‐induced turbulence. In this study, we create a new physics option for the Noah with Multi‐Parameterization (Noah‐MP) LSM that accounts for canopy‐induced turbulence based on the Harman and Finnigan, 2007–2008 methodology. The primary focus of this study is to quantify differences between Noah‐MP snowpack simulations using the classical physics option that neglects canopy‐induced turbulence with the new physics option that accounts for canopy‐induced turbulence. Overall, simulations using the new physics option tend to have better agreement with ground‐based SWE observations across 647 validation sites within the western United States. We intend for the new physics scheme to improve weather and hydrological applications for operational modeling systems that rely on the Noah‐MP LSM.Key Points This study presents a new physics option for Noah‐MP that accounts for canopy‐induced turbulence in the roughness sublayer Simulated SWE over shrublands using the new turbulence scheme agree more with observations than those using the traditional MOST scheme Differences in snow simulations are mainly attributable to differences in aerodynamic resistance to sensible heat below the canopy top

Evaluation and Comparison of Noah and Pleim–Xiu Land Surface Models in MM5 Using GÖTE2001 Data: Spatial and Temporal Variations in Near-Surface Air Temperature

Evaluation of MM5 Mesoscale Model at Local Scale for Air Quality Applications over the Swedish West Coast: Influence of PBL and LSM Parameterizations

Assessing and Improving Noah‐MP Land Model Simulations for the Central Tibetan Plateau

PERFORMANCE OF TAPM AGAINST MM5 AT URBAN SCALE DURING GÖTE 2001 CAMPAIGN

ORCHIDEE-MICT (revision 4126), a Land Surface Model for the High-Latitudes: Model Description and Validation

ORCHIDEE-MICT (v8.4.1), a Land Surface Model for the High Latitudes: Model Description and Validation

Evaluation of Noah Frozen Soil Parameterization for Application to a Tibetan Meadow Ecosystem

Description and Evaluation of the Peking University Land Model (Pkulm)

Assessing the simulated soil hydrothermal regime of the active layer from the Noah-MP land surface model (v1.1) in the permafrost regions of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

Assessment of Surface Exchange Coefficients in the Noah-MP Land Surface Model for Different Land Cover Types over China

Improving the Noah Land Surface Model in Arid Regions with an Appropriate Parameterization of the Thermal Roughness Length

Improving Land Surface Temperature Simulation of NOAH-MP on the Tibetan Plateau.

Elucidating Dominant Factors Affecting Land Surface Hydrological Simulations of the Community Land Model over China

Assessment and improvement of Noah-MP for simulating water and heat exchange over alpine grassland in growing season

Performances of CoLM and NCAR_CLM3.0 in Simulating Land-Atmosphere Interactions over Typical Forest Ecosystems in China Part I. Preliminary Analysis of the Simulations Based on Different Models

Improving Land Surface Temperature Modeling for Dry Land of China

Improved Historical Simulation by Enhancing Moist Physical Parameterizations in the Climate System Model NESM3.0

Climate Impacts of Parameterizing Subgrid Variation and Partitioning of Land Surface Heat Fluxes to the Atmosphere with the NCAR CESM1.2

Implementation and Evaluation of a Unified Turbulence Parameterization Throughout the Canopy and Roughness Sublayer in Noah‐MP Snow Simulations

Evaluating the Performance of BCC-CSM2-MR Model in Simulating the Land Surface Processes in China

Sensitivity of a regional climate model to land surface parameterization schemes for East Asian summer monsoon simulation