Abstract:The Biosphere‐Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) ground snow albedo algorithm is commonly used in land‐surface models (LSM), weather forecasting and research applications. This study addresses key uncertainties in BATS simulated ground snow albedo within the Noah‐MP LSM framework through evaluation and optimization of the Noah‐MP BATS ground snow albedo formulation using 2‐band (visible and near‐infrared (NIR)) in situ albedo observations at Rocky Mountain field stations. The Noah‐MP BATS ground snow albedo scheme is extremely sensitive to its input parameters. Namely, an ensemble generated by varying BATS input parameters within potentially plausible ranges provides an average daily range (maximum ensemble member minus minimum ensemble member) of ground snow albedo exceeding 0.45 in visible and NIR bands. Parameter optimization improves agreement between simulated and in situ observed ground snow albedo in visible, NIR and broadband spectrums. Importantly, optimized parameters result in reduced biases relative to observed fresh‐snow albedo and better agreement with observed albedo decay. Our analysis across different sites supports that the optimized BATS ground snow albedo parameters are appropriate to transfer in space and time, at least within the region studied (the central‐southern Rocky Mountains). The primary error source remaining after parameter optimization is that observed fresh‐snow albedo is highly variable, particularly in the NIR spectrum, whereas BATS fresh‐snow albedo is constant, an issue which requires further investigation. This study shows significant correlations between observed fresh‐snow albedo and surface meteorological conditions (e.g., downward shortwave radiation and temperature) which can support future model development that attempts to include a time‐varying formulation for fresh‐snow albedo. Fresh snow reflects up to 90% of incoming sunlight (albedo 0.9), but as it ages, the reflectivity declines to as much as 50% (albedo 0.5). Snow albedo has a strong influence on snowpack evolution, melt rates, and land surface energy balance. The Biosphere‐Atmosphere Transfer Schemes (BATS) snow albedo algorithm is commonly used to simulate snow albedo in climate and weather predictions. This study evaluates the BATS ground snow albedo algorithm and parameters within the widely used Noah‐MP land surface model, through comparisons with observations of snow albedo in the Rocky Mountains. The BATS snow albedo scheme is extremely sensitive to input parameters. We identify an optimal set of input parameters to calculate snow albedo using the ground observations. Additionally, applying the optimized parameters across different sites in the central‐southern Rocky Mountain region shows that optimized parameters are transferable in space and time within this region to sites with similar climate. The primary error source remaining after parameter optimization is the use of constant fresh‐snow albedo in BATS; in reality, observed fresh‐snow albedo is variable. Relationships between fresh‐snow albedo and environmental conditions could inform model development of a time‐varying formulation for fresh‐snow albedo in the future. The Biosphere‐Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) snow albedo formulation is highly sensitive to fresh‐snow albedo and snow age input parameters Parameter optimization substantially improves accuracy for BATS simulated ground snow albedo, particularly for ablation periods Optimized parameters improve accuracy of BATS simulated snow albedo and are transferable in time and space to sites with similar climate The Biosphere‐Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) snow albedo formulation is highly sensitive to fresh‐snow albedo and snow age input parameters Parameter optimization substantially improves accuracy for BATS simulated ground snow albedo, particularly for ablation periods Optimized parameters improve accuracy of BATS simulated snow albedo and are transferable in time and space to sites with similar climate

Implementation and Evaluation of a Unified Turbulence Parameterization Throughout the Canopy and Roughness Sublayer in Noah‐MP Snow Simulations

Quantifying contributions of uncertainties in physical parameterization schemes and model parameters to overall errors in Noah‐MP dynamic vegetation modeling

Assessing and Improving Noah‐MP Land Model Simulations for the Central Tibetan Plateau

Assessment and improvement of Noah-MP for simulating water and heat exchange over alpine grassland in growing season

Evaluation and development of surface layer scheme representation of temperature inversions over boreal forests in Arctic wintertime conditions

Enabling Advanced Snow Physics Within Land Surface Models Through an Interoperable Model‐Physics Coupling Framework

Evaluating and Enhancing Snow Compaction Process in the Noah‐MP Land Surface Model

Assessment of Surface Exchange Coefficients in the Noah-MP Land Surface Model for Different Land Cover Types over China

An Advanced Multiple‐Layer Canopy Model in the WRF Model with Large‐Eddy Simulations to Simulate Canopy Flows and Scalar Transport under Different Stability Conditions

Evaluation and Optimization of Snow Albedo Scheme in Noah‐MP Land Surface Model Using In Situ Spectral Observations in the Colorado Rockies

Improvement of the Noah land surface model for warm season processes: evaluation of water and energy flux simulation

Improving the Noah Land Surface Model in Arid Regions with an Appropriate Parameterization of the Thermal Roughness Length

Incorporating the acclimation of photosynthesis and leaf respiration in the Noah-MP land surface model: model development and evaluation

Are the Noah and Noah-MP land surface models accurate for frozen soil conditions?

Evaluation and Comparison of Noah and Pleim–Xiu Land Surface Models in MM5 Using GÖTE2001 Data: Spatial and Temporal Variations in Near-Surface Air Temperature

Modernizing the open-source community Noah with multi-parameterization options (Noah-MP) land surface model (version 5.0) with enhanced modularity, interoperability, and applicability

Assessing the simulated soil hydrothermal regime of the active layer from the Noah-MP land surface model (v1.1) in the permafrost regions of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

Improve the performance of the Noah‐MP‐Crop model by jointly assimilating soil moisture and vegetation phenology data

Characterizing and Constraining Uncertainty Associated with Surface and Boundary Layer Turbulent Fluxes in Simulations of Lake-Effect Snowfall

Description and Evaluation of the Peking University Land Model (Pkulm)

Stone Content Influence on Land Surface Model Simulation of Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration at Reynolds Creek Watershed