Abstract:Objective:To explore the differences in pre-treatment cranio-maxillofacial features and treatment results of the three main tooth extraction pattern for patients with skeletal class Ⅱ average deep overjet.Methods:In this retropective cohort study, 155 finished cases with skeletal class Ⅱ mean-angle deep overjet were selected from the Department of Orthodontics, Peking University Hospital of Stomatology. Among them, 15 cases with extraction of two maxillary first premolars, 45 cases with extraction of 4 first premolars, and 18 cases with extraction of maxillary first premolars and mandibular second premolars were included in this study. Cephalograms were measured before and after treatment to compare the difference among three groups.Then, the characteristics of each group were used to judge the extraction mode of 8 new patients.Results:The difference between the three groups before treatment is mainly reflected in the index of dentition and soft tissue. The OJ of the cases with extraction of two maxillary first premolars before treatment [(10.5±1.9) mm] is the largest, which is statistically different from the other two groups[the cases with extraction of 4 first premolars: (8.9±1.7) mm, the cases with extraction of maxillary first premolars and mandibular second premolars: (8.9±2.1 mm)]. The distal molar relationship was the most severe in cases with extraction of maxillary first premolars and mandibular second premolars [(-1.3±1.6) mm], which is statistically different from 4 first premolars extraction group [(0.2±1.8) mm]. The lower lip protrusion LL_EP of the groups with extraction of two maxillary first premolars [(2.8±3.0) mm] is significantly smaller than that in the other two groups [the cases with extraction of 4 first premolars: (5.1±2.5) mm, the cases with extraction of maxillary first premolars and mandibular second premolars: (3.8±3.0) mm], the differences were statistically significant. The only difference among the three groups after treatment is the molar relationship. The extraction mode for the new sample is 75%.Conclusions:Skeletal Class Ⅱ patients with average-angle deep overjet have their own characteristics for different extraction treatment modes. The extraction in mandibular arch is related to the anterior overjet and protrusion of the lower lip. The smaller the anterior overjet, the greater the protrusion of the lower lip, and the more likely it is to extract the lower teeth; The location of the extraction is mainly related to the distal relationship of the molars and the protrusion of the lower lip. The more severe distal relationship of the molars, the smaller the protrusion of the lower lip, the more likely it is to extract the second mandibular premolar. Otherwise, extract the first mandibular premolar.

The strategy of camouflage orthodontic extraction treatment for skeletal Class Ⅱ deformity by extraction orthodontic treatment.

Morphological Characteristics Influencing the Orthodontic Extraction Strategies for Angle's Class II Division 1 Malocclusions.

Pre-operative orthodontic treatment strategy of skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion

Treatment of Dental Class-II, Division 2 Malocclusion Associated with a Deep Anterior Overbite: A Case Report Orthodontic Camouflage

Orthodontic-surgical treatment for severe skeletal class II malocclusion with vertical maxillary excess and four premolars extraction: A case report

Camouflage treatment guided by facial improvement in hyperdivergent skeletal class II malocclusion

Strategic camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion (mandibular prognathism) using bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion and mandibular anterior subapical osteotomy

Comparison of Different Decompensation Approaches on Facial Profile in Orthodontic-Orthognathic Treatment for Skeletal Class III Patients

Treating High Angle Bimaxillary Protrusion with Three Kinds of Extraction Method: A Clinical Study

Skeletal and dental features of extraction cases in the second phase of two-phase treated Class Ⅱ malocclusion

Analysis of craniofacial features of patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ average angle deepoverjet in three different tooth extraction modes

[Clear aligner in orthodontic retreatment]

A patient with bimaxillary protrusion was treated by the extraction of four premolars and four compromised first molars: a case report

The effectiveness of asymmetric extraction in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions]

Incisor Positions and Soft-Tissue Profile in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Patients Before and after Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment

Vertical Control of a Severe Hyperdivergent Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Steep Posterior Occlusal Plane in a Camouflage Case

Camouflage treatment of posterior bite collapse in a patient with skeletal asymmetry by using posterior maxillary segmental osteotomy

Multi-disciplinary orthodontic camouflage treatment of a severe skeletal class III malocclusion with 1 year follow-up - A case report

A Comparison Study of Two Phase and Extraction Treatment on Class Ⅱ Malocclusion

Retrospective Study of Class II Malocclusion Patients with One Lower Incisor Extraction Treatment

Effects of camouflage treatment on dimensions of upper airway and surrounding structures in adult patients with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion