Abstract:Objective:To explore the differences in pre-treatment cranio-maxillofacial features and treatment results of the three main tooth extraction pattern for patients with skeletal class Ⅱ average deep overjet.Methods:In this retropective cohort study, 155 finished cases with skeletal class Ⅱ mean-angle deep overjet were selected from the Department of Orthodontics, Peking University Hospital of Stomatology. Among them, 15 cases with extraction of two maxillary first premolars, 45 cases with extraction of 4 first premolars, and 18 cases with extraction of maxillary first premolars and mandibular second premolars were included in this study. Cephalograms were measured before and after treatment to compare the difference among three groups.Then, the characteristics of each group were used to judge the extraction mode of 8 new patients.Results:The difference between the three groups before treatment is mainly reflected in the index of dentition and soft tissue. The OJ of the cases with extraction of two maxillary first premolars before treatment [(10.5±1.9) mm] is the largest, which is statistically different from the other two groups[the cases with extraction of 4 first premolars: (8.9±1.7) mm, the cases with extraction of maxillary first premolars and mandibular second premolars: (8.9±2.1 mm)]. The distal molar relationship was the most severe in cases with extraction of maxillary first premolars and mandibular second premolars [(-1.3±1.6) mm], which is statistically different from 4 first premolars extraction group [(0.2±1.8) mm]. The lower lip protrusion LL_EP of the groups with extraction of two maxillary first premolars [(2.8±3.0) mm] is significantly smaller than that in the other two groups [the cases with extraction of 4 first premolars: (5.1±2.5) mm, the cases with extraction of maxillary first premolars and mandibular second premolars: (3.8±3.0) mm], the differences were statistically significant. The only difference among the three groups after treatment is the molar relationship. The extraction mode for the new sample is 75%.Conclusions:Skeletal Class Ⅱ patients with average-angle deep overjet have their own characteristics for different extraction treatment modes. The extraction in mandibular arch is related to the anterior overjet and protrusion of the lower lip. The smaller the anterior overjet, the greater the protrusion of the lower lip, and the more likely it is to extract the lower teeth; The location of the extraction is mainly related to the distal relationship of the molars and the protrusion of the lower lip. The more severe distal relationship of the molars, the smaller the protrusion of the lower lip, the more likely it is to extract the second mandibular premolar. Otherwise, extract the first mandibular premolar.

Analysis of craniofacial features of patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ average angle deepoverjet in three different tooth extraction modes

Comparison of Different Decompensation Approaches on Facial Profile in Orthodontic-Orthognathic Treatment for Skeletal Class III Patients

Incisor Positions and Soft-Tissue Profile in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Patients Before and after Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment

Skeletal and dental features of extraction cases in the second phase of two-phase treated Class Ⅱ malocclusion

A patient with bimaxillary protrusion was treated by the extraction of four premolars and four compromised first molars: a case report

[Preliminary Investigation of Lower Second Molar Extraction in Correction of Severe Skeletal Class III Malocclusion].

Comparison of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment outcomes for borderline Chinese patients.

[Cephalometric Comparison of Soft-Tissue Morphology Between Extraction and Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment in Borderline Cases].

Oropharynx and hyoid bone changes in female extraction patients with distinct sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns: a retrospective study

Lower Second Molar Extraction in Correction of Severe Skeletal Class Iii Malocclusion

A Cephalometric Analysis of Adolescents with Classⅱ Divisionⅰmalocclusion Treated with Maxillary First Premolars Extraction

Effects of Two-Phase Treatment with Functional Appliances Followed by Extraction versus One-Phase Treatment with Extraction in Class II Growing Patients: A Case–Control Study

Class Ⅲ Malocclusion Treated by Second Premolar Extraction

[Preliminary study of treatment mechanism and stability in deep overbite malocclusion with hyperdivergent and hypodivergent skeletal pattern].

Effect of Upper Jaw or Double Jaw Premolar Extraction of Class Ⅱ Division Ⅰ Malocclusion Patients on Mandibular Third Molar Eruption with Cone Beam CT Images

Orthodontic Tteatment in Patients with the Extraction of Maxillary Incisors and the Mandibular Premolars

Quantification and Visualization of the Tooth Extraction Effects on Face with Spatially Dense Geometric Morphometrics

Craniofacial Hard and Soft Tissue Changes after Extraction Treatment Using Damon Ⅲ Appliance

[Long-Term Changes of Hard-Tissue in Borderline Cases with Extraction Vs. Non-Extraction Treatment].

[Compensation of Upper First Molar in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Patients Treated with Orthodontic-Surgical Treatment].

Morphological analysis of the alveolar bone of the anterior teeth in severe high-angle skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography