Effects of hard‐ and/or soft‐tissue grafting with early implant placement: Histomorphometric outcomes of an exploratory study in canines
Hyun‐Chang Lim,Kwang‐Seok Lee,Ronald E. Jung,Nadja Naenni,Ui‐Won Jung,Daniel S. Thoma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14320
2024-06-23
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Abstract:Objective To histomorphometrically determine the effects of hard‐ and/or soft‐tissue augmentation by applying the early implant placement protocol. Materials and Methods The distal roots of the maxillary second and third premolars were extracted in 10 mongrel dogs. After 1 month, early implant placement was performed in the distal roots, resulting in buccal dehiscence defects. Four treatments were then randomly applied: (1) guided bone regeneration (GBR), (2) connective tissue grafting (CTG), (3) simultaneous GBR and CTG (GBR + CTG) and (4) no further treatment (control). Healing abutments were connected to all implants to allow non‐submerged healing. At 4 and 16 weeks, tissue sections were harvested and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Results Group GBR presented the largest total tissue thickness at 4 weeks, but underwent a greater remodelling compared with the other groups between 4 and 16 weeks. At 16 weeks, the overall tissue thickness was largest in group GBR + CTG. This group was also the most favourable in terms of the level of the margo mucosae and the presence of mineralized tissue at the coronal level. Group CTG demonstrated a stable tissue thickness over time, with a larger thickness at 16 weeks compared with group GBR. Conclusion Simultaneous CTG and GBR resulted in the most‐favourable tissue thickness when applying the early implant placement protocol.
engineering, biomedical,dentistry, oral surgery & medicine