Abstract:The clinical significance of increased wear can mainly be attributed to impaired aesthetic appearance and/or functional restrictions. Little is known about the systemic effects of swallowed or inhaled worn particles that derive from restorations. As wear measurements in vivo are complicated and time-consuming, wear simulation devices and methods had been developed without, however, systematically looking at the factors that influence important wear parameters. Wear simulation devices shall simulate processes that occur in the oral cavity during mastication, namely force, force profile, contact time, sliding movement, clearance of worn material, etc. Different devices that use different force actuator principles are available. Those with the highest citation frequency in the literature are - in descending order - the Alabama, ACTA, OHSU, Zurich and MTS wear simulators. When following the FDA guidelines on good laboratory practice (GLP) only the expensive MTS wear simulator is a qualified machine to test wear in vitro; the force exerted by the hydraulic actuator is controlled and regulated during all movements of the stylus. All the other simulators lack control and regulation of force development during dynamic loading of the flat specimens. This may be an explanation for the high coefficient of variation of the results in some wear simulators (28-40%) and the poor reproducibility of wear results if dental databases are searched for wear results of specific dental materials (difference of 22-72% for the same material). As most of the machines are not qualifiable, wear methods applying the machine may have a sound concept but cannot be validated. Only with the MTS method have wear parameters and influencing factors been documented and verified. A good compromise with regard to costs, practicability and robustness is the Willytec chewing simulator, which uses weights as force actuator and step motors for vertical and lateral movements. The Ivoclar wear method run on the Willytec machine shows a mean coefficient of variation in vertical wear of 12%. Force measurements have revealed that in the beginning of the stylus/specimen contact phase the force impulse is 3-4 times higher during dynamic loading than during static loading. When correlating material properties to the wear results of 23 composite resins subjected to the Ivoclar method, some parameters could be identified and incorporated into a wear formula to predict wear with the Ivoclar method. A round robin test evaluating the wear of ten dental materials with five wear simulation methods showed that the results were not comparable, as all methods follow different wear testing concepts. All wear methods lack the evidence of their clinical relevance because prospective studies correlating in vitro with long-term in vivo results with identical materials are not available. For direct restorative materials, amalgam seems to be a realistic reference material. For indirect, namely crown and bridge materials, low strength ceramic is appropriate.

The correlation between laboratory and clinical wearing resistance of resin composites

Evaluation of wear resistance of dental resin composites with a 3D profilometer

Correlation of wear in vivo and six laboratory wear methods

Quantification of in vitro produced wear sites on composite resins using contact profilometry and CCD microscopy: a methodological investigation

A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials

An In Vitro Investigation Of Wear Resistance And Hardness Of Composite Resins

How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods

Wear Resistance of Bulk-fill Composite Resin Restorative Materials Polymerized under different Curing Intensities

Friction and wear of dental CAD/CAM composite resin

An approach to understanding tribological behaviour of dental composites through volumetric wear loss and wear mechanism determination; beyond material ranking

A method to evaluate profilometric tooth wear measurements

Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials

Simulated oral wear of packable composites

Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro

Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite

Abrasive wear and surface roughness of contemporary dental composite resin.

Wear behavior at margins of direct composite with CAD/CAM composite and enamel

Wear rates of regular and tempered composites

In vitro evaluation of OCA wear resistance of posterior composites

Developing an optimised method for accurate wear testing of dental materials using the 'Rub&Roll' device

Wear resistance of CAD/CAM one-piece screw-retained hybrid-abutment-crowns made from different restorative materials