Abstract:Taking the academic papers published during 1998-2007 by "Comparative Education Review" as research object to analyze these papers' research themes, research methods and the difference of research regions. We can see that in terms of research themes, "Comparative Education Review" attaches importance to macro educational system research and pays attention to the educational reform and development in various countries; it steps up with the development of times and studies the current focuses; the research in the field of micro educational practice is increasingly warming up; and the discussion on the disciplinary construction of comparative education goes up and down. In terms of research methods, documentary research is still the most important research means of "Comparative Education Review" ; the comprehensive application of different research methods has become one of the characteristics of "Comparative Education Review" ; qualitative research and quantitative research have presented equilibrium trend, the combination of the two can better embody the future development. In terms of research regions, the single country research is the main part of "Comparative Education Review" , which especially pays attention to the education of developing countries; the large-scaled transnational comparative research has drawn great attention; the global tendency and regional research have been gradually increasing. Our research on comparative education should clarify the research themes, upgrade the scientific level of comparative educational research methods, expand the research region of comparative education, establish stereoscopic research object, strengthen the self-construction of comparative educational academic groups, and deepen the disciplinary basic theoretical research.

Cross-disciplinarity of Comparative Education Research: the Construction of Sub-discipline Branches of Comparative Education

Reconsidering the Problem of Disciplinary Boundaries in Education:Educational Thought on the Interdisciplinary Research

Comparative Politics: its Disciplinary Characteristics and Prospects

Education: a Discipline or a Field?

Development of Comparative Education Discipline in Chongqing: Past and Future

Selection of Cross Subjects Based on the Discipline Construction

Between Discipline and Research Area:Institutionalized Higher Education Research

On Disciplinary Logic and Disciplinary Wisdom of Comparative Education

Methods and Paths:Methodological Thinking on Discipline Development of Postgraduate Pedagogy

Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: a comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field

On the Multiplicity of Comparative Education Research

Constructing and Empirical Study of Synthesized Model of Discipline Research:an Example of Agricultural Economics & Management

Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Crossing Arts and Science

Multi-disciplinary Research and Disciplinary Construction of Higher Education

Discipline-Crossing: Strategic Choice of Application-oriented Universities′ Disciplinary Construction

Education Itself:The Discipline Standpoint of Pedagogy and Its Theory Cornerstone

Research on Discipline Development and Discipline Difference of Intelligence Science in China

The New Development of American Comparative Education:Themes,Methods and Regions Analysis

Epistemology Foundation of Interdisciplinary Study——Taking Science Philosophy and Sociology of Knowledge As Angle of View

Analysis on the Interrelated Issues of Comparative Method in Educational Research

Differentiation and Integration of Humanities and Social Sciences