Enbloc resection of pelvic sarcoma involving region Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅳ and reconstruction with the prosthetic acetabulum pedicle screw and rod system

SHEN Jing-nan,WANG Jin,YIN Jun-qiang,HUANG Gang,YONG Bi-cheng,LI Hao-miao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2012.03.003

2012-01-01

Abstract:Objective This study is to evaluate the effect of en bloc resection of pelvic sarcoma involving region Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅳ and reconstruction with the prosthetic acetabulum pedicle screw and rod system. Methods A continuous and retrospective analysis was carried out in patients with pelvic sarcoma in region Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅳ who were treated by en bloc resection and reconstruction with the prosthetic acetabulum pedicle screw and rod system in orthopaedics oncology department of the first affiliated hospital of Zhongshan University from June 2009 to December 2010. The treatment effect and postoperative complications were evaluated. Inclusion criteria were as follows: primary pelvic sarcoma; no metastasis was detected in chest CT scan; stageⅡB according to Enneking classification; very likely to finish all courses of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy if required; external iliac vessels, sciatic nerve or pelvic viscera involvement was not detected by preoperative MRI; sarcoma was found involving at least three pelvic regions (regions Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅳ). Results Four patients with pelvic sarcoma involving region Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅳ underwent en bloc resection and reconstruction with the prosthetic acetabulum pedicle screw and rod system. There were three males and one female whose average age was 29.75(from 18 to 45). Pathological classification included Ewing’s sarcoma (two cases), chondrosarcoma (one case), and osteosarcoma (one case). Patients with Ewing’s sarcoma and osteosarcoma finished their neo-adjuvent chemotherapy. En bloc resection included tumor in pelvic region Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅳ, the tumor-invloved iliacus muscle, gluteus medius muscle, gluteus minius muscle and part of the gluteus maximus muscle. After resection, acetabulum, pelvic ring and lumbosacro region were reconstructed with the prosthetic acetabulum pedicle screw and rod system. Rehabilitation began three weeks after operation. Three months later, patients could walk with the crutches. Average follow-up time was 14 months (range from nine to 19 months). No relapse or metastasis was found. MSTS functional evaluation score was 66.67% (from 63% to 73%). Harris hip functional evaluation score was good in two cases and poor in two cases. Conclusions The goal of the treatment for the primary pelvic sarcoma is to achieve complete remission by wide tumor resection and to preserve the function of lower limb. Due to the application of the prosthetic acetabulum pedicle screw and rod system, not only sarcoma was successfully removed en bloc, but also the combination of acetabulum, pelvic ring and lumbosacro region were reconstructed. With recent therapeutic observation this system may live up to the functional expectation of both patients and orthopedic oncologists.