Evaluation of different surgical techniques and treatment outcomes of pelvic metastases

Wei GUO,Tao JI,Yi YANG,Jichuan WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2015.01-010
2015-01-01
Abstract:Background:The treatment of pelvic and sacral metastases remains diverse and has not a standard protocol. <br> Objective:The aim of the study is to retrospectively review different surgical procedures for pelvic metastases, especially for peri-acetabular metastases. <br> Methods:A total of 228 pelvic metastatic patients underwent surgical treatment between July 2000 and July 2014 in our hos-pital. There were 124 males and 104 females with an average age of (53.7±13.2) years (range, 20-82 years). There were 163 patients with primary malignant tumor, 23 with metastatic tumor confirmed by preoperative biopsy, and 46 with metastatic tumor confirmed by postoperative pathological section. The defect was reconstructed by screw-rods system in 39 patients. The acetabula were reconstructed in 162 patients including bone cement arthroplasty in 27, acetabular reinforcement with winged cup in 45, Steinmann pin with bone cement acetabuloplasty in 21 and pelvic prosthetic reconstruction in 69. Simple tumor resection was done in 18 patients. Hemipelvectomy was performed in 9 patients. <br> Results:The surgical procedure was accomplished in all the patients. But eventually, 171 patients were followed up with an average period of (13.0 ± 8.5) months (range, 6-24 months). Pain and mobility improvements were seen in all patients after operation. The average VAS pain score was 7.2±2.8 (range, 4-9) and 3.5±1.6 (range, 0-5) before and after operation, respec-tively. Function was evaluated based on MSTS93 score system. Average MSTS93 score was 18.3±4.9 (range, 12-26) in ac-etabular reconstruction patients and 23.5 ± 9.2 (range, 19-30) in the patients without acetabular invasion. In patients with HarringtonⅢacetabular metastatic lesion, two reconstruction techniques were used;the average MSTS93 score was 17.6± 4.2 (range, 13-23) in patients with Steinmann pin and bone cement acetabuloplasty and was 18.9±3.9 (range, 12-25) in pa-tients with pelvic prosthetic reconstruction. Local recurrence was found in 21 patients (12.3%). <br> Conclusions:The indication of surgical intervention for pelvic metastasis is severe pain and difficulty in ambulation caused by metastatic lesions. The surgical procedure for most metastases is intralesional surgery. Wide or marginal resection is an alternative method for solitary or good prognostic pelvic metastasis. For patients with HarringtonⅢacetabular metastatic le-sion, from the functional point of view, pelvic prosthetic reconstruction is better than Steinmann pin and bone cement ace-tabuloplasty.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?