A tentative discussion on differences between large-scale tungsten and tin mineralizations in South China

HUA RenMin,LI GuangLai,ZHANG WenLan,HU DongQuan,CHEN PeiRong,CHEN WeiFeng,WANG XuDong
2010-01-01
Abstract:Both tungsten and tin are the most prevailing mineral resources in China. Large-scale tungsten and tin mineralizations took place mostly in South China,especially in the Nanling Mountains and the neighboring areas. The two elements are very closely related to and accompanied with each other and always occur together in most ore deposits. However,differences do exist between tungsten and tin mineralizations in many aspects. Spatial distribution shows that the eastern sector of the Nanling Mountains is characterized by strong and dense W mineralization,while Sn mineralization becomes stronger westwards. China's two largest Sn ore deposits are distributed in the western margin of the South China fold system. Although both tungsten and tin mineralizations have the same highest ore-forming epoch of 160~150 Ma,the tin mineralization is spanned from the late Xuefeng Period (~800 Ma) to Late Yanshanian Movement (80 Ma). The Late Yanshanian Movement is in fact another highlight of tin mineralization. The tin-bearing granite and tin mineralization show much closer relationship with the participation of mantle derived materials than tungsten mineralization. Therefore,the large-scale tin mineralization took place either near the so-called Shi-Hang Zone where long-term deep faulting was activated and A-type granites were emplaced or during the Late Yanshanian period when the South China continent was in a strong tensional geodynamic environment. The principal factors responsible for these differences may include the diversity of geochemical properties between the two elements and the differences in tectonic backgrounds,stratigraphic characteristics and magmatic activities between the eastern part and the western part of South China.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?