Abstract:Technical governance refers to governing activities in which scientific and technological advances are systematically applied for a more efficient functioning of society, especially in the political and economic spheres. Technical governance models are shaped by the cultural, political and social aspects of regions and countries. The national response to COVID-19 has highlighted differences between these models. For China, the theory of technical governance was of great importance in the modernization of society. It is a specific field of study in contemporary China and part of the philosophy of technology. This paper presents a way to rethink the contradictions between scientism and anti-scientism. Scientism claims that scientific and technological progress has reasonable foundations and strengthens the position of science. Anti-scientism criticizes science and technology and sees them as a threat to the modern world. The so-called “reconsideration approach” is not about finding a compromise, but about critically integrating these opposing views in order to build a theory of technical governance. Reconsideration approach is a deliberative, historical and concrete scientific study. In this context, the word “deliberative” means a multilateral view when addressing issues of science and technology policy. The term “historical” rejects the only true definition of technology and indicates that it changes over time. The word “specific” refers to an assessment of technical issues that should be considered in a specific context, taking into account differences between countries, regions, groups and participants. Through the reconsideration approach, technical governance can respond to the challenges created by emerging technologies. A good technology governance model should not only describe the mechanism for integrating new technologies into society but also correctly combine human and technical factors, taking into account the national context of the country. Thus, the reconsideration approach for technical governance is a dynamic theory that responds to new technological challenges.

Review on the Sci-tech Associations' Decision Consultation

Study on the Process Organization and Method Efficiency of the Public's Participating in S&T Decision-making

[Study on the Function and Influence of Hi-Tech on Medical and Health Undertakings Development in China].

Review on Energy Decision-making Supporting Technology

Social and Institutional Environment for Public Decision-making Oriented Technology Assessment

The Science of Science and Technology Policy and The Scientific and Democratic Decision-making in the New Reform of Science and Technology System

Technology Decision-making Guiding by Scientific Views on Development

Decision Making in an Era of Post-Normal Science：a Case Study of the Approval Process of GM Rice in China

The Problems of Chinese Scientific Community and Its Countermeasures from the Perspective of Scientific Governance

Study of Evaluation on Science & Technology Resources and Allocation

The status quo of the scientific and technical talents' evaluation with the innovation and choice of evaluation methods

The “Reconsideration Approach” to Technical Governance: a Study in China’s Context and the Post-Pandemic Era

Research on the Influence of Scientists in Science and Technology Decision Making——Taking 863 Program As Example

Review on the relationship between technology alliance and innovation

A retrospective analysis of China's science and technology evaluation policy since 1978

A Review and Foresight of China's Theoretical Study on the Social Responsibility of Scientists for the Past Ten Years

A Discussion of Necessity on Environmental Impact Assessment of Scientific and Technological Development in China

Reforming China's S&T System

Development status and countermeasures of China's science and technology think tank

A Study of the Quality Assessment of Online Sci-tech Research Papers

Analysis on the Pattern of Public Participatory Technology Assessment and Its Enlightenment to China