Dignity's Philosophical Paradox and Its Constitutional Settlement: Reading Kant again

Zhao Juan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8263.2013.07.011
2013-01-01
Abstract:Kant put forward a creative proposition in philosophical history,in which human dignity should be existed as an end,but never as a mean barely.However,it was this dignity's idea that supported Kant's retributive death penalty theory in the field of criminal law,which resulted in Kant's paradox of dignity idea.The cognitive root of this paradox was that Kant persisted with his view of equal supremacy,in other words,Kant treated the equality with favor and too much emphasis.After the Second World War,Germany established the human dignity as the constitutional status in the Fundament Law and put this constitutional principle into judicial practices,which dispelled Kant's paradox to a great extent.In China,the dignity's constitutional nature should be understood as its constitutional value,not as its any philosophical judgment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?