Abstract:Introduction Over the last several decades, sperm morphology has represented a standard component of semen analysis. However, its clinical utility is not well-defined, despite continual efforts by the WHO to address critiques of semen morphology criteria through increasingly strict guidelines. Issues with intra- and inter-laboratory technical variability, in addition to the subjective nature of the morphology assessment, have been thoroughly discussed in existing literature. Furthermore, current literature has highlighted the low predictive value of sperm morphology abnormalities in assisted fertility treatment (ART) and natural pregnancy outcomes. As of 2020, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines have noted that morphology alone is not highly predictive or diagnostic of infertility. However, past survey studies have demonstrated the pervasive belief among physicians of the value of sperm morphology, potentially leading to counseling patients towards more expensive ART methods. These concerns call into question the emphasis placed on sperm morphology assessment and its value in the clinical setting. Objective To better understand the impact of sperm morphology on fertility, we assessed sperm morphology in a population of known fertile men. Methods Healthy men over 18 years of age were recruited to provide one semen sample prior to vasectomy from March 2020 through November 2022. Inclusion criteria for the study was as follows: (1) patients were required to have biological children under the age of 5 years old, with no history of difficulty achieving pregnancy, and (2) had undergone no prior fertility procedures. Sperm morphology was analyzed using Papanicolaou stain with Kruger strict criteria by two technicians in an Andrology specialty laboratory per the WHO 5th edition manual. Results There were 83 men who participated in the study, 68 of whom (81.9%) had a complete sperm morphology assessment available. On average, participants were 37 years of age and had a mean BMI of 28 (22.8, 33.2). Of those with a smoking history available (n=61), 38 (62.3%) were non-smokers, 7 (11.5%) were former smokers, and 16 (26.2%) were current smokers. Patients had an average of 3 children with a mean youngest child age of 11.5 months old. There were 38 patients (55.9%) with 3% or lower normal sperm morphology, including two patients who had 0% normal morphology (Table 1). The most common morphologic abnormalities were head shape defects (n=59, 84.3%), followed by coiled tails (n=14, 20.3). Men 3% or lower normal sperm morphology were four times as likely to have both head and tail abnormalities than men with 4% or greater normal sperm morphology (n=8 vs n=2, respectively); half of these men also had lower than normal motility, whereas none of the men with 4% or greater normal sperm morphology had lower than normal motility. Conclusions More than half of fertile male patients (65.6%) had lower than normal sperm morphology in our study. The results of our study further question the clinical relevance of sperm morphology on fertility outcomes and if the current approach in assessing morphology is too strict. Disclosure No.

Relationship Between Sperm Motility Parameters and Sperm Morphology

The relationship between the kinesis parameter and motility of sperm with computer-assisted semen analysis in infertile patients

Study of the Relation Between Sperm Concentration and Motility

Study on relationship between sperm morphology and semen concentration or semen motility of male infertile patients

Influence of Sperm Morphology on the Outcomes in IVF - ET

(212) The Questionable Clinical Utility of Sperm Morphology: Rate of Isolated Teratospermia in a Population of Fertile Men

Comparison of the Parameters Obtained by Sperm Quality Analyzer V and Computer-aided Sperm Analysis System

Relationship of Sperm Motility with Seminal Plasma and Sperm DNA Integrity in Male Patients with Infertility

Sperm Morphology and in Vitro Fertilization

Sperm morphology: Evaluating its clinical relevance in contemporary fertility practice

Multicenter Study on Reproducibility of Sperm Morphology Assessments

Correlation Between Mitochondrial Membrane Potential of Sperm and Semen Paremeters and Male Obesity

Correlation of recurrent miscarriage with semen parameters,teratozoo-spermia and DNA integrity

Effects of the normal sperm morphology rate on the clinical and neonatal outcomes of conventional IVF cycles

Correlation Analysis and Research Between Sperm DNA Fragments and Morphology and Assisted Reproductive Outcomes

The relationship between sperm DNA integrity and semen parameters

Correlations of Sperm Mitochondrial Membrane Potential with Semen Parameters and Male Obesity

The Relationship between Acrosome Reaction, Sperm Morphology and Ovum Fertilization Rate in IVF

Distribution of normal and abnormal forms among motile, non-motile, live and dead human spermatozoa

Performance evaluation of sperm concentration, motility, and morphological analysis for GSA ‐810 series of sperm quality analysis system

Application of Combined Semen Routine Analysis and Modified Papanicolaou Staining in Assisted Reproductive Technology