Evaluation of the value of ST elevation in lead III greater than lead II and ST elevation in lead V4R for diagnosing right ventricular myocardial infarction by coronary angiography

Wang Gui-song,Guo Li-jun,Niu Jie,Zhang Fu-chun,Gao Wei,Mao Jie-ming
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of ST elevation in lead III>II(ST↑_(Ⅲ>Ⅱ))compared with ST elevation in lead V4R (ST_(V4R)↑)in diagnosing right ventricular myocardial infarction(RVMI),based on the occlusion of RCA proximal to the right ventricular branch shown by coronary angiography(CAG).Methods One hundred and fifty-eight patients with acute inferior MI admitted within 12 hours from onset of infarct symptoms underwent emergency CAG.Each patient was analyzed for the presence of ST↑_(Ⅲ>Ⅱ) and(ST_(V4R)↑).The sensitivity and specificity of ST↑_(Ⅲ>Ⅱ) and ST_(V4R)↑ for diagnosing RVMI were calculated and compared.Results In 69 of 158 patients,the occlusion was proximal to the right ventricular branch of RCA while in 89 patients it was distal to the right ventricular branch of RCA or in LCX.The sensitivity of ST↑_(Ⅲ>Ⅱ) for diagnosing RVMI was significantly higher than that of ST_(V4R)↑(98.6% vs 66.7%,P<(0.01),)but the specificity of ST↑_(Ⅲ>Ⅱ) was markedly lower than that of ST_(V4R)↑(58.4% vs 80.9%,P<0.01).In patients with both ST↑_(Ⅲ>Ⅱ) and ST_(V4R)↑,the sensitivity was no lower than that of ST↑_(Ⅲ>Ⅱ)(P>0.05),while the specificity was higher than that of either ST↑_(Ⅲ>Ⅱ) or ST_(V4R)↑.Conclusion Based on the findings of CAG,ST↑_(Ⅲ>Ⅱ) and ST_(V4R)↑ are of higher sensitivity and higher specificity,respectively.For diagnosing RVMI associated with acute inferior MI,coexisting ST↑_(Ⅲ>Ⅱ) and ST_(V4R)↑can improve the accuracy for diagnosing RVMI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?