Emancipating the Grey Zone:Reflection on the Narration in History of Communication Research
Hai-long LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13451/j.cnki.shanxi.univ(phil.soc.).2015.01.010
2015-01-01
Abstract:Since Chinese communication study has long been at the stage of reception,the narration of current mainstream history of communication research is seldom questioned by Chinese scholars. In recent years,however,with the increasing acquaintance with western world,communication researchers in China began to apply critical theories from the perspective of cognitive sociology to the history of communication research. Therefore,their study evolves from passive learning from the west to the reflective research on intellectual history of communication. The achievement of intellectual history of communication study depends more on reflecting the narrative modes in mainstream narration than directly denying the myths in it. The meta-narration of mainstream history of communication research can be categorized as chronicling style,milestone style,masters style,contesting-schools style and single-idea style,most of which were saturated with optimistic progression and whiggish interpretation. In order to challenge these meta-narrations,a promising approach is using irony. It will make the odd zone,which is hard to be cataloged,speak up again and ridicule the logic of mainstream narration. If interpreted from language of continuity and rupture,the grey zones could be understood as the rupture in continuity or continuity in rupture. This approach will not only deepen our understanding of imported theories,but also enable us to discover other ignored possibilities,which may contribute to enlightening the future research.