Abstract:Background/Aim: Periampullary diverticulum poses technical challenges and may lead to endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) related complications during ERCP. Empirically minor EST plus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) could be a safe alternative by causing less thermal injury. However, little has been reported about its effectiveness and safety in patients with periampullary diverticula. Our study was designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of minor EST plus EPBD with those of EST alone in patients with periampullary diverticula and bile duct stones. Methods: All patients in two groups were prospectively enrolled in a large tertiary referral center from January 2006 to November 2007. Less than 1/3 of the regular EST incision length and 3 minute dilation using 8-mm-diameter balloons were applied in the minor EST plus EPBD group. Results: Eight-three (49 male, 34 female) patients underwent minor EST plus EPBD, and 72 patients (40 male, 32 female) underwent EST. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in gender ratio, number and size of diverticula, number and size of bile duct stones, and diameter of bile ducts prior to the interventions. Average age was however different in two groups (57.83 vs. 67.69). Most patients had multiple bile stones with the average number of stones in two groups being 2.43 vs. 2.67 and the average size of stones being 12.51 mm vs. 13.06 mm. Minor EST plus EPBD compared with EST alone resulted in similar outcomes in terms of overall successful stone removal (100% vs. 100%), stone clearance at first attempt (78% vs. 72%, p = 0.379), and the use of mechanical lithotripsy (ML) (12% vs. 21% p = 0.138). Complication rate in the EST plus EPBD group was significantly lower than the EST group (4% vs. 21%, p < 0.05). Pancreatitis occurred in 3 patients and 2 patients in two groups respectively. Twelve patients developed bleeding and 1 patient developed cholangitis in the EST group. No perforation or death occurred in either group. Logistic regression showed both age and method (EST or. EST plus EPBD) were insignificant in predicting stone clearance rate at first attempt and rate of ML usage. Age was not significant in predicting complication rates, while the use of EST plus EPBD was significantly associated with reduced risk of complication rate at 0.05 level (OR = 0.29, 95% CI = (0.1106, 0.7683)). Conclusion: Minor EST plus EPBD was found to be as effective as EST in bile duct stone removal for patients with periampullary diverticula. In addition we found minor EST plus EPBD has a better safety profile than traditional EST for these patients.

Minor Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Plus Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Is An Effective And Safer Alternative For Endoscopic Sphincterotomy During Ercp In Patients With Peiampullary Diverticula And Bile Duct Stones

The comparative analysis between two methods for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Clinic Effect of Combination Use of Endoscopy and Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Cholecystoiithiasis and Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cholelithiasis

Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies on the sphincter of Oddi

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy or Papillary Balloon Dilatation for Choledocholithiasis.

Dilation Time in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Common Bile Duct Stones.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilatation versus sphincterotomy alone for common bile duct stones removal: a randomised controlled trial

Adding Balloon Sphincteroplasty to Sphincterotomy in Endoscopic Removal of Large Bile Duct Stones - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with large-balloon dilation and endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone in removal of large bile duct stones

Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones

Is endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation a better option than endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone in removal of large bile duct stones? A retrospective comparison study.

Oddi Sphincter Repair for Biliary Complications after Endoscopic Papillectomy

Endoclip Papillaplasty (ECPP) Versus Limited EST Plus EPLBD for a Decrease in Recurrent Choledocholithiasis: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Optimal dilation duration of 10 mm diameter balloons after limited endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial

Application of Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones

EUS- Versus ERCP-guided Biliary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: Evidence from Randomized Controlled Studies

Clinical analysis of endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis

Ampulla dilation with different sized balloons to remove common bile duct stones

Percutaneous Transhepatic Papillary Balloon Dilation versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Common Bile Duct Stones: A Multicenter Prospective Study