The Chinese Scholars' Route for Researching Conflict Rule

Yong-ping XIAO
2005-01-01
Abstract:This article divides the Chinese scholars' route for researching conflict rule into “norm-analysis” and “function-estimation”. Though introducing Chinese scholars' different opinions on the structure and function of conflict rule, the author proposes a kind of researching route called “relation-compare”. After studying conflict rule according to the so-called “relation-compare” route, the author points out: (a) The current jurisprudence pays no attention to the Conflict of Laws and conflict rule when it classifies laws and legal norms. (b) Substance/procedure, substantive law/procedural law, and substantive norm/procedural norm are 3 pairs of legal definitions that are different and related to one another. (c) The law shall be classified as substantive law, procedural law and law of application-of-law, and the legal norms shall be classified as substantive norm, procedural norm and norm of application-of-law. (d) The norm of application-of-law shall include norm of scope of application-of-law, choice-of-law norm, conflict rule and legal definition norms. (e) Conflict rule is a particular kind of choice-of-law rule, which takes precedence of substantive rule to be applied. Generally speaking, it is not a king of mandatory rule, but for China's court, it shall not be applied upon the choice of private parties. And (f) Conflict rule should not be applied whenever the international uniform substantive rule may be applied to the case with foreign element.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?