A Randomized Comparative Study of Olprinone Treating on Congestive Heart Failure

DU Gang,LI Zi-cheng,ZHANG Tao,CHEN Jian-xin,WU Shao-rong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-9965.2010.06.013
2010-01-01
Abstract:Aim:To assess the efficacy and the security of olprinone versus milrinone treating the congestive heart failure.Methods: Thirty two patients with severe chronic heart failure(NYHA Ⅲ-Ⅳ) were been treated by olprinone(n=15) or milrinone(n=17).End points were clinical outcome,echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction,left ventricular dimensions,left ventricular volume,left ventricular shortening fraction,and sternite as well.Results: The olprinone effective rate 86.7% versus milrinone 82.4% by NYHA curative effect score.The Boston effective rate of olprinone controlled group was 60% and milrinone controlled group was 62.5% as well.The total adverse effect of olprinone controlled group was only 1 while 4 of milrinone group.But there were no statistics difference.Further studies were needed to determine the adverse effect of the both drugs.Conclusion:The results of this study suggest that olprinone significantly improve cardiological function as same as milrinone.There is no statistics difference on adverse effect between two drugs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?