Abstract:Background The theoretical basis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is statistical inference of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between any polymorphic marker and a putative disease locus. Most methods widely implemented for such analyses are vulnerable to several key demographic factors and deliver a poor statistical power for detecting genuine associations and also a high false positive rate. Here, we present a likelihood-based statistical approach that accounts properly for non-random nature of case–control samples in regard of genotypic distribution at the loci in populations under study and confers flexibility to test for genetic association in presence of different confounding factors such as population structure, non-randomness of samples etc. Results We implemented this novel method together with several popular methods in the literature of GWAS, to re-analyze recently published Parkinson’s disease (PD) case–control samples. The real data analysis and computer simulation show that the new method confers not only significantly improved statistical power for detecting the associations but also robustness to the difficulties stemmed from non-randomly sampling and genetic structures when compared to its rivals. In particular, the new method detected 44 significant SNPs within 25 chromosomal regions of size < 1 Mb but only 6 SNPs in two of these regions were previously detected by the trend test based methods. It discovered two SNPs located 1.18 Mb and 0.18 Mb from the PD candidates, FGF20 and PARK8 , without invoking false positive risk. Conclusions We developed a novel likelihood-based method which provides adequate estimation of LD and other population model parameters by using case and control samples, the ease in integration of these samples from multiple genetically divergent populations and thus confers statistically robust and powerful analyses of GWAS. On basis of simulation studies and analysis of real datasets, we demonstrated significant improvement of the new method over the non-parametric trend test, which is the most popularly implemented in the literature of GWAS.

Linear trend tests for case-control genetic association that incorporate random phenotype and genotype misclassification error.

Increasing Power for Tests of Genetic Association in the Presence of Phenotype And/or Genotype Error by Use of Double-Sampling.

Computing Asymptotic Power and Sample Size for Case-Control Genetic Association Studies in the Presence of Phenotype And/or Genotype Misclassification Errors.

A Nonparametric Alternative to the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test in Genetic Case-Control Association Studies: the Jonckheere-Terpstra Trend Test

A Shrinkage Method for Testing the Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium in Case‐Control Studies

“Power Comparisons for Genotypic Vs. Allelic TDT Methods with >2 Alleles”

Incorporating individual error rate into association test of unmatched case-control design.

Analysis of Case-Control Association Studies: SNPs, Imputation and Haplotypes

A Robust and Powerful Two‐step Testing Procedure for Local Ancestry Adjusted Allelic Association Analysis in Admixed Populations

Comparison of Two‐phase Analyses for Case–control Genetic Association Studies

Retrospective Versus Prospective Score Tests For Genetic Association With Case-Control Data

A nonparametric test for association with multiple loci in the retrospective case-control study.

Single-Marker Analysis For Unmatched Case-Control Data

A Novel Method for Analyzing Genetic Association with Longitudinal Phenotypes

Single-Locus Genetic Association Analysis By Ordinal Tests

Haplotypes Vs Single Marker Linkage Disequilibrium Tests: What Do We Gain?

Power Estimation Of Multiple Snp Association Test Of Case-Control Study And Application

A Robust and Efficient Statistical Method for Genetic Association Studies Using Case and Control Samples from Multiple Cohorts

A Robust Statistical Method For Association-Based Eqtl Analysis

Linear Models for Analysis of Multiple Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms with Quantitative Traits in Unrelated Individuals

Exploring Case-Control Genetic Association Tests Using Phase Diagrams.