Abstract:In case-control studies, genetic associations for complex diseases may be probed either with single-locus tests or with haplotype-based tests. Although there are different views on the relative merits and preferences of the two test strategies, haplotype-based analyses are generally believed to be more powerful to detect genes with modest effects. However, a main drawback of haplotype-based association tests is the large number of distinct haplotypes, which increases the degrees of freedom for corresponding test statistics and thus reduces the statistical power. To decrease the degrees of freedom and enhance the efficiency and power of haplotype analysis, we propose an improved haplotype clustering method that is based on the haplotype cladistic analysis developed by Durrant et al. In our method, we attempt to combine the strengths of single-locus analysis and haplotype-based analysis into one single test framework. Novel in our method is that we develop a more informative haplotype similarity measurement by using p values obtained from single-locus association tests to construct a measure of weight, which to some extent incorporates the information of disease outcomes. The weights are then used in computation of similarity measures to construct distance metrics between haplotype pairs in haplotype cladistic analysis. To assess our proposed new method, we performed simulation analyses to compare the relative performances of ( 1) conventional haplotype based analysis using original haplotype, ( 2) single-locus allele based analysis, ( 3) original haplotype cladistic analysis (CLADHC)by Durrant et al., and ( 4) our weighted haplotype cladistic analysis method, under different scenarios. Our weighted cladistic analysis method shows an increased statistical power and robustness, compared with the methods of haplotype cladistic analysis, single locus test, and the traditional haplotype-based analyses. The real data analyses also show that our proposed method has practical significance in the human genetics field.

Exploring Case-Control Genetic Association Tests Using Phase Diagrams.

Comparison of Two‐phase Analyses for Case–control Genetic Association Studies

A Nonparametric Alternative to the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test in Genetic Case-Control Association Studies: the Jonckheere-Terpstra Trend Test

Single-Marker Analysis For Unmatched Case-Control Data

Inferring Haplotype/disease Association by Joint Use of Case-Parents Trios and Case-Parent Pairs.

Differentiating the Cochran‐Armitage Trend Test and Pearson's Χ2 Test: Location and Dispersion

A Phase Diagram for Gene Selection and Disease Classification

Incorporating single-locus tests into haplotype cladistic analysis in case-control studies.

Robust Genomic Control and Robust Delta Centralization Tests for Case-Control Association Studies

Single-Locus Genetic Association Analysis By Ordinal Tests

Power Estimation Of Multiple Snp Association Test Of Case-Control Study And Application

Power Analysis of Principal Components Regression in Genetic Association Studies.

Analysis of Case-Control Association Studies: SNPs, Imputation and Haplotypes

Pearson's Test, Trend Test, and MAX Are All Trend Tests with Different Types of Scores

THE HAPLOTYPE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM TEST FOR GENOME-WIDE SCREENS: ITS POWER AND STUDY DESIGN

Association Test Between Haplotypes and Longitudinal Traits in Complex Pedigrees.

“Power Comparisons for Genotypic Vs. Allelic TDT Methods with >2 Alleles”

Linear trend tests for case-control genetic association that incorporate random phenotype and genotype misclassification error.

Haplotypes Vs Single Marker Linkage Disequilibrium Tests: What Do We Gain?

Computing Asymptotic Power and Sample Size for Case-Control Genetic Association Studies in the Presence of Phenotype And/or Genotype Misclassification Errors.

A Geometric Perspective on the Power of Principal Component Association Tests in Multiple Phenotype Studies