Inner Magnetospheric Magnetic Dips and Energetic Protons Trapped Therein: Multi‐Spacecraft Observations and Simulations
Ze‐Fan Yin,Xu‐Zhi Zhou,Qiu‐Gang Zong,Zhi‐Yang Liu,Chao Yue,Ying Xiong,Lun Xie,Yong‐Fu Wang,Sui‐Yan Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2021gl092567
IF: 5.2
2021-03-29
Geophysical Research Letters
Abstract:Localized magnetic field depressions in the inner magnetosphere, known as magnetic dips, are produced by the diamagnetic motion of energetic ions injected via substorm activities. The magnetic dips, if deep enough, can produce a local minimum in the radial profile of the field strength to trap the injected protons. Therefore, the trapped protons would drift at the same speed as the dip propagation, which leads to the simultaneous enhancements of proton fluxes in multiple energy channels at the leading edge of the dip structure. On the trailing side, the reduction of proton fluxes shows dispersive features, which can be attributed to the energy‐dependent drift motion of the injected protons in the absence of the local field minimum. This scenario is examined based on comparisons between multi‐spacecraft observations and test‐particle simulations, and their good agreement validates the scenario to shed new light on the dynamics of the inner magnetosphere‐magnetotail coupled system. During magnetospheric substorms, energetic ions are injected from the magnetotail toward the inner magnetosphere, and the diamagnetic motion of these ions produces longitudinally localized field depressions named magnetic dips. Recent studies with multi‐spacecraft observations have revealed the westward propagation of the magnetic dips, which are believed to originate from the westward drift of the injected ions in the geomagnetic field. One may expect from the wide energy range of the injected ions and the energy‐dependence of their drift motion that these ions would be gradually dispersed in the longitude to cause the expansion and shallowing of the dip structure. These expectations, however, are not consistent with the observations of sustained magnetic dips associated with simultaneous ion flux enhancements at multiple energy channels. To reconcile this inconsistency, we propose the ion trapping process for magnetic dips with sufficient depths, which explains the simultaneous flux enhancements observed on the leading edge of the dip structure. On the trailing side, the ions cannot be trapped due to the weaker field depressions, which explains the observations of dispersive ion flux reduction given a discontinued and/or localized process of substorm injection. This scenario is supported by the good agreement between test‐particle simulations and multi‐spacecraft observations. We analyze the behavior of energetic protons associated with magnetic dip structures based on observations and test‐particle simulations Magnetic dips with strong field depressions can trap energetic protons inside and have them drift at the same speed as the dip propagation Observed dispersionless increases and dispersive reductions of proton fluxes on dip leading and trailing sides are reproduced by simulations We analyze the behavior of energetic protons associated with magnetic dip structures based on observations and test‐particle simulations Magnetic dips with strong field depressions can trap energetic protons inside and have them drift at the same speed as the dip propagation Observed dispersionless increases and dispersive reductions of proton fluxes on dip leading and trailing sides are reproduced by simulations
geosciences, multidisciplinary