Abstract:In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a number of Shakespeare scholars, including Israel Gollancz (1894), H.R.D. Anders (1904), J. Churton Collins (1904), and Gilbert Murray (1914) wrote convincingly of Shakespeare’s debt to classical Greek drama. However, in the century since, most scholars and editors have repeatedly held that Shakespeare was not familiar with Greek drama. In Classical Mythology in Shakespeare (1903), Robert Kilburn Root expressed the opinion on Shakespeare’s ‘lesse Greek’ that presaged this enduring dismissal: “It is at any rate certain that he nowhere alludes to any characters or episodes of Greek drama, that they extended no influence whatsoever on his conception of mythology.” (p. 6) This century-long consensus against Attic dramatic influence was reinforced by A.D. Nutall, who wrote, “that Shakespeare was cut off from Greek poetry and drama is probably a bleak truth that we should accept.” (Nutall, 2004, p.210) Scholars have preferred to maintain that Plutarch or Ovid were Shakespeare’s surrogate literary mediators for the playwright’s adaptations from Greek myth and theatre. Other scholars, however, have questioned these assumptions, including Laurie Maguire, who observed that “invoking Shakespeare’s imagined conversations in the Mermaid tavern is not a methodology likely to convince skeptics that Shakespeare knew Greek drama.” (p. 98) This near-universal rejection of Greek drama as Shakespeare sources have profound philological implications. Indeed, this essay argues that the proscription against recognizing the Attic canon as an influence in Shakespeare has been driven by the belief that Will Shakspere of Stratford had, at most, an education that was Latin-based. The examples show that the real author had to have been exposed to both the Greek language and the Greek dramatists. Evidence for alternative candidates, including Edward de Vere, shows that many were schooled in Greek and that some even collected and supported translations of Greek works. It is my contention that Shakespeare’s dramatic imagination was actually fired by the Greeks, and Shakespeare research has clearly suffered from a century of denial.

An Early Modern Canon Formation of English Literature in Hesperides,or the Muses' Garden

A Study of Manuscript English Commonplace Book The Muses' Garden

The Readers of 17Th-Century English Manuscript Commonplace Book Hesperides, or the Muses’ Garden

Hesperides, or the Muses' Garden and Its Manuscript History

Havelock Ellis's literary criticism, canon formation, and the heterosexual Shakespeare

Ben Jonson, Literary Style, and Presents Most Famous Plays

Issues and challenges in compiling a corpus of Early Modern English plays for comparison with those of William Shakespeare

Literature and Law in the Era of Magna Carta

Huon of Bordeaux: First Modern English Translation by Catherine M. Jones and William W. Kibler. Medieval & Renaissance Text Series. New York and Bristol: Italica Press, 2021, xxiii, 329 pp.

A New Approach To Shakespeare: A Review Of Shakespeare In The Post-War English Drama

The Rise of "English Literature" at the University of Cambridge

Dante’s Divine Comedy in Early Renaissance England

New and Old Worlds: The Tempest and early colonial discourse

English Literature Abroad

In the Light of English Literature: an Exordium on Old English

In Agincourt's Shadow: Hoccleve's "Au treshonorable conpaignie du Iarter" and the Domestication of Henry V

Shakespeare's and Milton's Impact on Chinese Literature and Culture: A Preliminary Comparison

A Century of Scholarly Neglect: Shakespeare and Greek Drama

Shakespeare’s and Milton’s Impact on Chinese Literature and Culture: A Preliminary Comparison

Transformation or Conformation? The English Broadside Ballad and the Playhouse, 1797–1844

Medieval Harrowings of Hell and Spenser's House of Mammon