Abstract:Background Oral dental treatment cause anxiety, fear, and physical stress. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of moderate sedation by remimazolam with alfentanil vs. propofol with alfentanil in third molar extraction. Methods This single-center, randomized, single-blind clinical trial included 100 adults who underwent third molar ambulatory extraction. All patients had continuous infusion of Alfentanil 0.2 μg/kg/min. Group remimazolam with alfentanil (group RA) had an induction dose of 80 μg/kg and maintenance dosage of 5 μg/kg/min. In group propofol with alfentanil (PA group), propofol was infused at an initial concentration of 1.8 μg/mL under target controlled infusion (TCI) mode and a maintenance concentration of 1.5 μg/mL. The incidence rates of adverse effects were recorded and compared. Depth of sedation was assessed using the modified observer alertness/sedation assessment (MOAA/S) and entropy index. Recovery characteristics were recorded and complications observed for next 24 h. Results The incident of adverse events 6 (12%) in the group RA was lower than the group PA 25 (50%) [Mean difference 0.136 (95%CI, 0.049–0.377); P < 0.05], with no serious adverse events during the sedation procedure. The incidence of injection pain in group RA was significantly lower than that in group PA [4 vs. 26%, mean difference 0.119 (95%CI, 0.025–0.558); P = 0.004]. Before starting local anesthesia, the mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate of the PA group were lower than those of the RA group. None of the patients required further treatments for a decreased heart rate, blood pressure, or low SpO 2 . The rate of moderate sedation success was 100% in both groups. The MOAA/S score was similar between the groups indicating that the depth of sedation was effective. Group RA had significantly shorter recovery and discharge times than those of group PA. Conclusions Remimazolam with alfentanil is a safer and more effective alternative for ambulatory sedation and can reduce recovery and discharge time and the incidence of perioperative adverse events compare with propofol. Clinical trial registration http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx , identifier: ChiCTR2200058106.

Efficacy and Safety of Three Modes of Intravenous Propofol in Pain-Free Tooth Extraction

Evaluation of Propofol Target Controlled Infusion with Fentanyl Intravenous Sedation on the Removal of Impacted Wisdom Tooth

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion for Sedation During Coblation-Assisted Upper Airway Procedure.

Sedation and Safety of Propofol for Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Comparison Of Sedative Effects Between Dexmedetomidine And Propofol In Painless Artificial Abortion

Moderate sedation by total intravenous remimazolam-alfentanil vs. propofol-alfentanil for third molar extraction: A prospective randomized controlled trial

A comparison between target-controlled and manually controlled propofol infusions in patients undergoing routine surgical procedures.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine in propofol-based sedation for ERCP procedures: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial

Effect Assessment of Single Propofol Sedation in Procedures of Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Comparison Between Intravenous Nalbuphine and Lidocaine in Reducing Propofol-Induced Injection Pain During Gastroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of propofol injection and digoxin injection on postoperative recovery period agitation and postoperative pain in patients undergoing general anesthesia

Effects of different propofol induction method on cardiovascular reactions

Comparison of Different Propofol Administration During Anesthesia Induction in Craniotomy Patients

Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine on Propofol Anesthesia for Painless Gastroscopy

Effect Comparison on Intraoperative Sedation of Dexmedetomidine, Midazolam and Propofol

Comparison of propofol-hydromorphone and propofol-dexmedetomidine in patients with intubation after maxillofacial plastic surgery.

Comparison of propofol and remifentanil for conscious sedation during breast biopsy surgery

[Intravenous Sedation with Midazolam and Propofol Target Controlled Infusion on Patients'perioperative Anxiety under the Mandibular Third Molar Extraction].

Combined Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Anaesthesia and Local Infiltration Anaesthesia in Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Propofol Alone Versus Propofol in Combination with Remifentanil or Ketamine for Analgesia during Gastroscopy and Colonoscopy.

Effect of Parecoxib Preapplication on Propofol Injection Pain