Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of dexmedatomidine versus propofol in combination with fentanyl in sterotactic intracranial haematoma minimally invasive suction treatment for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.Methods Forty patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage,aged from 35 to 78 years,Glasgrow coma score (GCS) of 6-14 points and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Ⅱ or Ⅲ level,were randomly divided into dexmedetomidine group and propofol group (n=20).Fentanyl (1 μg/kg) was intravenously injected in all the patients.Then 2 μg·kg-1 ·h-1h dexmedetomidine or 6 mg·kg-1 ·h-1 propofol was slowly infused for 15 mins.Local anesthesia was performed and head frame was put.The surgical treatment began until patients could spontaneously breathe and tolerate head frame.A maintenance dose of dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1) or propofol (3 mg·kg-1·h-1) was continuously infused till the end of the surgery.If body movement appeared,additional dexmedetomidine (5 μg) or propofol (20 mg) was used and the operation suspended for 5 mins.The heart rate (RR),mean arterial pressure (MAP),systolic blood pressure (SBP),diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded before entering operating room,on drilling and before and after the placement of head frame.Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (paO2) and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (paCO2) were also recorded after the placement of head frame and on drilling.Perioperative adverse reactions were observed.Results There were no significant differences in HH,MAP,SBP or DBP between the two groups before entering the operating room (all P>0.05).Compared with propofol group,HH was significantly decreased and MAP,SBP and DBP were significantly increased in dexmedetomidine group on drilling (all P<0.05).There were no significant differences in HH,MAP,SBP and DBP in dexmedetomidine group before and after head frame placement (all P>0.05).HH,MAP,SBP and DBP after head frame placement were significantly higher than those before placement in propofol group(P<0.05).Compared with propofol group,paO2 was significantly increased and paCO2 was significantly decreased in dexmedetomidine group after head frame placement and on drilling (all P<0.05).The incidence of intraoperative restlessness,hypotension and sychnosphygmia and postoperative nausea and vomiting in dexmedetomidine group were significantly lower than those in propofol group (all P<0.05).Conclusion It is safe and reliable to apply dexmedetomidine in intracranial hematoma suction minimally invasive surgical treatment for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.Good sedation,stable hemodynamics,and slight respiratory inhibition can be achieved during the operation.(Shanghai Med J,2012,35:1001-1004)

Comparison of propofol-hydromorphone and propofol-dexmedetomidine in patients with intubation after maxillofacial plastic surgery.

Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for the Sedation of Tube-Retention after Oral Maxillofacial Surgery

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion for Sedation During Coblation-Assisted Upper Airway Procedure.

Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol Sedation ocirculation After Cardiac Surgery : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison between Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for Sedation in Patients with Intubation after Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol Sedation Improves Sublingual Microcirculation After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Comparison Of Sedative Effects Between Dexmedetomidine And Propofol In Painless Artificial Abortion

Comparation of the Effect of Sedation of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Patients with Breast Cancer Surgery

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Stereotactic Brain Surgery in Patients with Intractable Psychosis

Dexmedetomidine vs propofol sedation reduces delirium in patients after cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

[Comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol for short-term sedation in early postoperative period after cardiac surgery]

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Sedation after Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

Clinical Study of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Propofol for Post-Operative Patients in Intensive Care Unit

Comparison of Intraoperative Sedation With Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol on Acute Postoperative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial

Study of the sedative and analgesic effect of combining dexmedetomidine with lidocaine cream during recovery period after tracheotomy in oral and maxillofacial tumor surgery

Effects of dexmedetomidine on general anesthesia with closed-loop target controlled infusion of propofol (Xi’an 710004)

Effect of dexmedetomidine and propofol on sedation and hemodynamics of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation after cardiac valve surgery

Effects of small dose of dexmedetomidine on sedation and analgesia in patients undergoing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy before surgical treatment of oral and maxillofacial tumor

Effect Comparison on Intraoperative Sedation of Dexmedetomidine, Midazolam and Propofol

Clinical observation of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in combination with fentanyl in sterotactic intracranial haematoma minimally invasive suction treatment for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage

A comparative study of dexmedetomidine and nicardipine in the induction of controlled hypotension in the patients during orthognathic surgery