Abstract:Introduction and hypothesis In order to improve the knowledge POP physiopathology and POP repair, a generic biomechanical model of the female pelvic system has been developed. In the literature, no study has currently evaluated apical prolapse repair by posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation using a generic model nor a patient-specific model that personalize the management of POP and predict surgical outcomes based on the patient’s pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The aim of our study was to analyze the influence of a right and/or left sacrospinous ligament fixation and the distance between the anchorage area and the ischial spine on the pelvic organ mobility using a generic and a patient-specific Finite Element model (FEM) of the female pelvic system during posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF). Methods Firstly, we used a generic 3D FEM of the female pelvic system previously made by our team that allowed us to simulate the mobility of the pelvic system. To create a patient-specific 3D FEM of the female pelvic system, we used a preoperative dynamic pelvic MRI of a 68 years old woman with a symptomatic stage III apical prolapse and cystocele. With these 2 models, a SSF was simulated. A right and/or left SSF and different distances between the anchorage area and the ischial spine (1 cm, 2 cm and 3 cm.) were compared. Outcomes measures were the pelvic organ displacement using the pubococcygeal line during maximal strain: Ba point for the most posterior and inferior aspect of the bladder base, C point the cervix’s or the vaginal apex and Bp point for the anterior aspect of the anorectal junction. Results Overall, pelvic organ mobility decreased regardless of surgical technique and model. According to the generic model, C point was displaced by 14.1 mm and 11.5 mm, Ba point by 12.7 mm, and 12 mm and Bp point by 10.6 mm and 9.9 mm after left and bilateral posterior SSF, respectively. C point was displaced by 15.4 mm and 11.6 mm and Ba point by 12.5 mm and 13.1mm when the suture on the sacrospinous ligament was performed at 1 cm and 3 cm from the ischial spine respectively (bilateral posterior SSF configuration). According to the patient-specific model, the displacement of Ba point could not be analyzed because of a significative and asymmetric organ displacement of the bladder. C point was displaced by 4.74 mm and 2.12 mm, and Bp point by 5.30 mm and 3.24 mm after left and bilateral posterior SSF respectively. C point was displaced by 4.80 mm and 4.85 mm and Bp point by 5.35 mm and 5.38 mm when the suture on the left sacrospinous ligament was performed at 1 cm and 3 cm from the ischial spine, respectively. Conclusion According to the generic model from our study, the apex appeared to be less mobile in bilateral SSF. The anchorage area on the sacrospinous ligament seems to have little effect on the pelvic organ mobilities. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04551859 .

Biomechanical Effects of Partial Sacrectomy on the Sacroiliac Joint

Biomechanical Effects of Transverse Partial Sacrectomy on the Sacroiliac Joints

[Biomechanical Effects of Sacrectomy Extents on Stability of Lumbo-Iliac Fixation Using Iliac Screw Techniques].

Biomechanical effects of the extent of sacrectomy on the stability of lumbo-iliac reconstruction using iliac screw techniques: What level of sacrectomy requires the bilateral dual iliac screw technique?

Biomechanical analysis of L5/S1 complex and sacroiliac joints on the stability of lumbo-iliac fixation

Biomechanical Effect of Sacroiliac Screw Fixation with Different Needling, Points on Extorsion Unsta-Hie Pelvis

Biomechanical advantages of dual over single iliac screws in lumbo-iliac fixation construct

Biomechanical advantages of dual iliac screws over single ones in lumbo-iliac fixation construct

Mobility analysis of a posterior sacrospinous fixation using a finite element model of the pelvic system

Applied anatomic study of the parameters of screw fixation for the sacroiliac joint

Preservation of the contralateral sacral nerves during hemisacrectomy for sacral malignancies

Factors Associated With Spinopelvic Fixation Mechanical Failure After Total Sacrectomy.

Biomechanical Effects of Multi-segment Fixation on Lumbar Spine and Sacroiliac Joints: A Finite Element Analysis

Finite Element Analysis of Sacral-Alar-iliac Screw Fixation for Sacroiliac Joint Dislocation.

Biomechanical Research on Contour Cage with Transacetabular Screws Fixation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Development and Current Situation of Reconstruction Methods Following Total Sacrectomy

Reconstruction following oncological iliosacral resection

Biomechanical effects of S1 sacroiliac screws versus S2 sacroiliac screws on sacroiliac screws combined with a lumbar iliac fixation in the treatment of vertical sacral fractures: a biomechanical finite element analysis

En Bloc Resection of Tumor Involving Partial Sacrum and Ipsilateral Sacroiliac Joint with Reservation of Contralateral Sacral Foramina