A Novel Formula for Evaluating the Scholarship of Teaching and Research in University
Yingyu Cui,Zhenyu Wang,Zhihe Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ermm-19.2019.12
2019-01-01
Abstract:Purpose: To come up with an objective, fair and yet easy-to-understand approach to conduct annual teaching and research appraisal of faculty in university; Procedures and Methods: Collecting data of funds, the number of articles and reviews with high impact factor and the number of outstanding papers from 25 universities, respectively, then trying different calculation methods to compare the efficiency of faculty; Results: Taking impact factor, essential science indicator of papers and total funds three popular and important factors into consideration, we composed a novel formula to quantitatively determine teaching and research productivity level of faculty in universities; Conclusions: A novel formula for faculty performance appraisal was proposed to enhance the construction of world-class universities and world-class disciplines in China. Since 2000, paying more attention on research and less on teaching has been gradually prevailing in most of universities of mainland China, which severely affect teachers’ teaching efficacy and promotion. This orientation has seriously frustrated the enthusiasm and efficiency of teachers in teaching work, resulting in a continuous decline in the quality of undergraduate teaching. On June 20th, 2018, leaders of more than 150 national universities in mainland China gathered at Sichuan University participate in the conference of the Ministry of Education to accelerate the construction of a high level of undergraduate education. Finally, they converged to the joint commitment of Chengdu to claim that cultivating novel talents is the core mission of higher education in the era of the rejuvenation of the nation, namely, the so-called “the first class undergraduate education declaration” or “Chengdu Declaration”, and a new undergraduate education initiative of "taking undergraduate education as the base" and promoting the "four regressions", that is, “return to common sense, principal obligations, original desire aspiration and fond dream” to be the basic compliance of the reform and development of higher education [1], adhering to people-centered education, moral education as the first principle, taking high moral values establishment and talents cultivation as the fundamental tasks of higher education in China. Obviously, one of the tasks of the conference was trying to adjust the previous evaluation policy in which one-sided emphasis was put on scientific research instead of teaching in colleges and universities of mainland China. Earlier since 1990’s, project funds, SCI papers and talent titles have gradually been used to measure the value of teachers and ranks of universities across the country. This excessive pursuit of "academic GDP" encourages advisors to recruit more graduates because only this way can they rapidly gain more benefits – funds, rewards, reputations and social status. Meanwhile, their university can improve their rankings among national universities, which will further help university gain more funding and resources. This looks like a good virtuous circle, and Figure1 is a typical and popular comparison among Chinese universities. Briefly, only funds and SCI papers are considered teachers’ merits. And this inadvertently undermines the teaching and training of undergraduates. Or the greater emphasis on research has harmed the teaching of undergraduates. 5th International Conference on Education Reform and Modern Management (ERMM 2019) Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 361