Abstract:Objective: Mergers of health science faculties in China have resulted in two different admission pathways for medical students. A uniform-code model prioritizes admission to a specific institution with secondary assignment to major. A separate-code model prioritizes admission directly to a school within an institution. This study investigates the impact of these two admission pathways on medical student selection and on the satisfaction of students with their major. Methods: Medical students at 16 medical schools across China completed a questionnaire survey. Descriptive calculation, chi-square tests, and probit models were used for analysing the data. Results: A total of 3132 completed surveys were included in the analysis. Compared with the students admitted under the uniform-code pathway, a significantly larger proportion of the students admitted under the separate-code pathway had medicine as the first preferred major (89.6% vs 79.6%, p=0.000); compared with those students enrolled into medicine not as their first preferred major, a significantly larger proportion of students enrolled into medicine as their first preferred major were willing to study medicine if choosing again (80.1% vs 62.4%, p=0.000) or to recommend the major to other students (73.3% vs 65.2%, p=0.000). Probit models showed that medical students admitted under the separate-code admission pathway were more likely to choose medicine as their first preferred major at application (beta=0.96, p=0.000); medical students admitted into medical school as their first preferred major were more likely to be willing to study medicine if choosing again (beta=0.53, p=0.000) or to recommend the medical major to other students (beta=0.18, p=0.010). Conclusion: Separate-code admission is more likely to result in matriculants who choose medicine as their first preferred major and are more likely to be intrinsically interested in medicine than those applicants assigned to medicine from the uniform admission process.

Discipline Rankings and University Admission Attractiveness: Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China

Understanding international students' motivations to pursue higher education in mainland China

An empirical evaluation of Chinese college admissions reforms through a natural experiment

From Rejection to Acceptance: the Institutionalization of Adopting University Ranking Outcomes As Policy and Strategic Tools in China Since the 1980S

The return of university reputation in job applications: evidence from a field experiment in China

The Institution of Merit: A Study of Chinese College Admissions

Are University Rankings Statistically Significant? A Comparison among Chinese Universities and with the USA

Are Opportunities to Equalize Elite High Schools Discriminatory? Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Design

Does School Quality Matter?: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Rural China.

Discipline Reputation Evaluation Based on PhD Exchange Network

Do Students Prioritize Majors or Specific Colleges? Analyzing the Factors That Influence Preferences in China

University Rank and Bachelor's Labour Market Positions in China

Chinese College Admissions Reforms : Experimental and Empirical Evaluations

Establishing World-Class Universities in China: Deploying a Quasi-Experimental Design to Evaluate the Net Effects of Project 985

A Revealed Preference Ranking of Universities and Colleges' Attractiveness

Preference Submission Mechanisms and Matching Qualities: An Empirical Study on China's College Entrance Examination System

Do Tournament Incentives Matter in Academics? Evidence from Personnel Data in a Top-Tier University in China

Impact of University Mergers on Admission of Medical Students in China

China's policy responses to university ranking: changes and new challenges

The impact of student's ordinal cognitive ability rank on school violence: Evidence from China

Improving Education Equality and Quality: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China