Abstract:In sociology, the interest in order is determined, among other things, by the identification of various factors that labilize and determine it. The factor under consideration, as a subject, is objectively difficult for social analysis and practical application of its results. Among the trigger reasons are legal culture and legitimacy, which are studied in this theoretical work from heuristic and analytical perspectives. It is assumed that legal culture, as a set of values aggregated by society and the state, can itself act as a factor of legitimacy for such an order. The disclosure of heuristic interest is carried out through legal consciousness of a person, a conscious choice of the model of rational (for oneself or the state) behavior, and the work of socio-legal institutions. Identifying the immanent signs of legal culture, we come to a conclusion that the critical mass of socially accumulated and legal knowledge provokes a qualitative leap in the development of both social and legal orders. This development determines the formation of an architecture of not only social but also nomological values, which creates the necessary conditions for the stability of social relations according to the objective rules provided by the legislator. The author emphasizes the impossibility of predetermining the primacy of the values under consideration since social and normative actions ensure the necessary balance of interests that are corresponding in nature, where unsatisfied frustrating expectations are considered as the main problems. Such expectations are associated with the violation of this balance, expressed in the permanent conflict between law and law enforcement, as the quintessence of the penetrating clash of social and legal orders, where society insists on defeating part of the monopoly on violence in the case of citizens’ deviant behavior and demilitarization of the work of legal institutions that is related to the condemnation of non-conformity, and where the state protects the objectivity of the rules of conduct and the extension of their sphere of influence by giving them legitimacy. The considered social order is seen as the basis for such an organization of life in society where the state acts as a moderator, introducing norms as irreducible standards of responsibility of each individual, correcting his behavior model towards rationality through legal culture that ensures legal awareness, conformity and legitimacy of socio-legal institutions. Legal culture laid down by society and supported by the state makes it possible to adopt a rational model of behavior in society and to make it resistant to destructive social phenomena.

Aesthetic Morality Theory vs Free order

The Liberation of Human Nature:Marcuse's Aesthetics of Liberation in Artisticness and Aesthetics

Legal Realism and Criminal Justice in Transitional Society

On Whether Beauty Can Become the Law of Value of Free Life of Nations and States

Beautiful China and Ideological Mission of Literary Aesthetics

Disinterestedness and Aesthetic Mind

On the Establishment of the Principle of Public Order and Good Morals

A Critique of Pan-Moralization:Putting Morality in Its Right Place

Aesthetics is Generative Oneness of Individuality and Sociality——on a Long Time Controversy of an Aesthetic Problem

On the Dialectical Unity of Rule by Law and Rule by Morality in Socialist Market Economy

On the Traditional Legal Order in China's Modernization Process

On Aesthetic Transcendence

The Moral Progress in the View of Historical Materialism

Law and Moral——Three Argumentations on Legitimacy of Law

Axiological Rules and the Political Philosophy in Ancient China

The Religious Support for Social and Mental Order

Leisure,Aesthetics and Harmonious Society

A Metaphysics of Aesthetics:Notes on a Comparison between Eastern and Western Aesthetics

LEGAL CULTURE AS A FACTOR OF LEGITIMACY OF THE SOCIAL AND LEGAL ORDER

Moral Good or Moral Evil: Methods to Promote National Moral Character (3)

Humanistic Morality:The Possibility of a Third Morality