Abstract:Objective:To investigate the value of MRI in the differential diagnosis of breast masses with a maximum diameter ≤1 cm.Methods:This retrospective study reviewed the preoperative MRI findings of 160 patients with small breast masses in the Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University between September 2012 and December 2018. There were 49 patients with malignant lesions and 111 patients with benign lesions. The mass location, morphological features, time-signal intensity curve (TIC), T2-weighted image features(T2WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the masses were compared. Student’s t test was used to compare patient age between two groups. The Mann-Whitney U test was employed to compare lesion size and ADC value between two groups. The count data (mass location, surrounding fat sign, shape, margin, internal enhancement and TIC type) were compared by χ2 test. The variables like proportion of concurrent contralateral cancer and T2WI features were compared by Fisher exact test. The pairwise comparison in the subgroups was adjusted by Bonferroni. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the age and ADC value was drawn. A binary logistic regression was performed for multivariate analysis using the " Forward: LR" method to establish a diagnostic model for benign and malignant diseases. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate of this model were calculated. The nomogram of the model was plotted.Results:(1) Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in surrounding fat sign, margin of mass, internal enhancement, TIC type, T2-weighted image features and ADC values between the benign group and malignant group (χ2=13.083, 11.224, 7.628, 14.060, 21.892; P<0.001, 0.004, 0.006, 0.001, <0.001; Z=-3.952, P<0.001). (2) Multivariate analysis showed that age>50 years old, positive peripheral fat sign, slightly hypointense or peripheral hyperintense signal on T2-weighted images, and ADC value ≤1.22×10-3 mm2/s were independent risk factors for malignancy (OR=6.728, 95%CI: 2.123~21.318, P=0.001; OR=5.545, 95%CI: 1.306~23.533, P=0.020; OR=31.110, 95%CI: 2.167~446.576, P=0.011; OR=13.794, 95%CI: 2.096~90.790, P=0.006; OR=5.802, 95%CI: 1.350~24.938, P=0.018). (3) Differential diagnosis model: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate of the diagnostic model combining the above-mentioned characteristics for the differential diagnosis of small breast masses was 89.2%(33/37), 69.4%(59/85), 55.9%(33/59), 93.6%(59/63) and 75.4%(92/122), respectively.Conclusions:Benign and malignant small breast masses overlap a lot in MRI features. It is challenging to make a differential diagnosis based on single feature. The combination of age, surrounding fat sign, T2-weighted image features and ADC values helps to increase the accuracy of diagnosis.

The Value of Mammography and Breast MRI in Detecting Lesion Within Dense Breast

The Value of MRI in Diagnosing Breast Cancer in Mammographic Dense Breasts

Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study

The Diagnostic Value of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Non-Calcified Malignant Breast Lesions Showed on Mammography: Comparison with Histopathology

The comparison of the diagnostic value of mammography,ultrasonography and MRI for breast non-mass enhancement lesions

[Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Breast Lesions Which Need Biopsy].

The Diagnostic Value of Dedicated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer: Comparative Study with Digital Mammography and Ultrasound

MRI in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions with Clustered Micro-Calcifications Showing on Mammography

Valuation of morphology and dynamic enhanced images features of breast diseases with 1.5T MRI

Correlative Analysis of Mammographic and MRI Findings of Breast Malignant Lesions

Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Analysis

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Diagnosis of Dense Breast Lesions

Clinical value of 3.0T MRI combined with computer aided diagnosis in breast tumors

Comparative Analysis on Mammography and MRI Features of Breast Benign Lesions

Diagnostic value of MRI in breast imaging reporting and data system 4 mammography-detected ultrasound-negative pure calcification lesions

Clinical study of digital mammography, contrast-enhanced MRI as well as their combination in the diagnosis of breast cancer

Comparatire study of enhanced MRI with combined non-enhanced MRI sequences in screening of breast lesions

Diagnostic values of magnetic resonance imaging in breast calcification

Analysis of Cases with MRI Misdiagnosed Breast Lesions

The Diagnostic Value of Both Mammography and MRI in Combination with Clinical Features in High-Risk Breast Lesions

Magnetic resonance imaging for differential diagnosis of small breast masses