Comparison on CDFI and CEUS in Diagnosis of Early and Late Hepatic Artery Thrombosis after Liver Transplantation

LV Su-qin,WANG Ping,ZHENG Rong-qin,REN Jie,XU Er-jiao,LIAO Mei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13929/j.1003-3289.2012.08.028
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the value of CDFI and CEUS in diagnosis of early and late hepatic artery thrombosis(HAT) after liver transplantation.Methods Totally 64patients with suspected HAT by CDFI and clinical presentation underwent CEUS.Patients were divided into early HAT patients(30days) and later HAT patients(≥30days).Presence or absence of the proper left and right hepatic arteries were observed,and the peak velocity,resistive index,acceleration time,as well as the presence or absence of turbulence and the peak velocity of turbulence were measured.Taking DSA or CTA +clinical follow-up+sonograms as standards,the sensitivity,specificity,accuracy of CDFI and CEUS in diagnosis of early and later HAT were calculated.Results There were 18early patients and 46late patients.The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy of CDFI and CEUS for early HAT patients was 100%(6/6),83.33%(10/12),88.89%(16/18) and 100%(8/8),100%(10/10),100%(18/18),respectively,while for late HAT patients was 0,100%(36/36),78.26%(36/46) and 100%(9/9),97.30%(36/37),97.83%(45/46),respectively.Conclusion Compared with CDFI,CEUS can directly display hepatic artery running,being better than CDFI especially for diagnosis of early HAT after liver transplantation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?