Abstract:Recent years have seen great advances in software engineering and programming languages. Unfortunately, software is still far from bug-free, even for those deployed. Static analysis is a good approach to eliminating numerous bugs, but its conservative nature of analysis unavoidably constrains its capacity. Dynamic analysis, on the other hand, utilizes program runtime execution data, which complements static approaches. This thesis describes three dynamic techniques that leverage program runtime data to improve software quality.First, we present a statistical debugging algorithm, called S OBER, which automatically localizes software faults without any prior knowledge of the program semantics. This statistical debugging alleviates the high cost associated with manual debugging. Featuring a similar rationale to hypothesis testing, SOBER quantifies the fault relevance of each predicate in a principled way. We systematically evaluate S OBER under the same setting as previous studies, and compare S OBER with other seven algorithms. The result clearly demonstrates the advantages of SOBER over existing approaches.Second, we discuss automated program failure triage, which is a closely related problem with automated debugging. Recent software systems usually feature an automated failure reporting component, with which a huge number of failures are collected from software end-users. In order to effectively leverage the valuable program failure data, the collected failures need to be first triaged, i.e., to locate the most severe failures, and to assign them to appropriate developers. Lying in the center of failure triage is failure indexing, which tries to group failures due to the fault together. In this thesis, we propose a statistical debugging-based approach to program failure triage, called R-PROXIMITY, which better indexes failures and facilitates failure assignment than existing approaches. Finally, we describe a program dynamic slicing-based approach to failure indexing, which complements R-PROXIMITY. R-PROXIMITY is a quality failure indexing tool, but its effectiveness relies on a sufficient number of correct executions, which may or may not be available in practice. The proposed dynamic slicing-based approach does not require any correct executions, and hence perfectly complements R-PROXIMITY . All the three techniques are subject to three mid-sized programs grep, gzip, and flex, and the result validates their advancement of the state of the art.

Hierarchical Static Test Method in Code Analysis

Effective code coverage in compositional systematic dynamic testing

Validating Static Warnings via Testing Code Fragments

Scaling Symbolic Execution to Large Software Systems

A Hybrid Approach to Detecting Security Defects in Programs

A Study of Static Warning Cascading Tools (Experience Paper)

Evaluating and Integrating Diverse Bug Finders for Effective Program Analysis

VBSAC: a value-based static analyzer for C

Test Analysis: Searching for Faults in Tests (N)

Implementing and Executing Static Analysis Using LLVM and CodeChecker

Improving software security with static automated code analysis in an industry setting

Statistical debugging and automated program failure triage

Self-adaptive static analysis

Detecting Integer Bugs Based on Static and Dynamic Program Analysis

An Approach to Merge Results of Multiple Static Analysis Tools (short Paper).

Simulink Model Static Analysis Results Based on Abstract Interpretation

Dynamic basic block-based test suite reduction

Scalable and Extensible Static Memory Safety Analysis with Summary over Access Path

An Automatic Examination Method for C Language Code Structure

Automatically Inspecting Thousands of Static Bug Warnings with Large Language Model: How Far Are We?

Scalable Fault Detection Based on Precise Access Path