Abstract:Importance:Blood pressure (BP) is a known risk factor for overall mortality and cardiovascular (CV)-specific fatal and nonfatal outcomes. It is uncertain which BP index is most strongly associated with these outcomes.Objective:To evaluate the association of BP indexes with death and a composite CV event.Design, Setting, and Participants:Longitudinal population-based cohort study of 11 135 adults from Europe, Asia, and South America with baseline observations collected from May 1988 to May 2010 (last follow-ups, August 2006-October 2016).Exposures:Blood pressure measured by an observer or an automated office machine; measured for 24 hours, during the day or the night; and the dipping ratio (nighttime divided by daytime readings).Main Outcomes and Measures:Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) expressed the risk of death or a CV event associated with BP increments of 20/10 mm Hg. Cardiovascular events included CV mortality combined with nonfatal coronary events, heart failure, and stroke. Improvement in model performance was assessed by the change in the area under the curve (AUC).Results:Among 11 135 participants (median age, 54.7 years, 49.3% women), 2836 participants died (18.5 per 1000 person-years) and 2049 (13.4 per 1000 person-years) experienced a CV event over a median of 13.8 years of follow-up. Both end points were significantly associated with all single systolic BP indexes (P < .001). For nighttime systolic BP level, the HR for total mortality was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.17-1.28) and for CV events, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.30-1.43). For the 24-hour systolic BP level, the HR for total mortality was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.16-1.28) and for CV events, 1.45 (95% CI, 1.37-1.54). With adjustment for any of the other systolic BP indexes, the associations of nighttime and 24-hour systolic BP with the primary outcomes remained statistically significant (HRs ranging from 1.17 [95% CI, 1.10-1.25] to 1.87 [95% CI, 1.62-2.16]). Base models that included single systolic BP indexes yielded an AUC of 0.83 for mortality and 0.84 for the CV outcomes. Adding 24-hour or nighttime systolic BP to base models that included other BP indexes resulted in incremental improvements in the AUC of 0.0013 to 0.0027 for mortality and 0.0031 to 0.0075 for the composite CV outcome. Adding any systolic BP index to models already including nighttime or 24-hour systolic BP did not significantly improve model performance. These findings were consistent for diastolic BP.Conclusions and Relevance:In this population-based cohort study, higher 24-hour and nighttime blood pressure measurements were significantly associated with greater risks of death and a composite CV outcome, even after adjusting for other office-based or ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Thus, 24-hour and nighttime blood pressure may be considered optimal measurements for estimating CV risk, although statistically, model improvement compared with other blood pressure indexes was small.

Is "usual" Blood Pressure A Proxy for 24-H Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Predicting Cardiovascular Outcomes?

Association of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure with Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Blood Pressure on Ambulatory Monitoring and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease and All-cause Mortality: Ecological Validity or Measurement Reliability?

Risk Stratification by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Across Jnc Classes of Conventional Blood Pressure

Ambulatory Hypertension Subtypes and 24-Hour Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure As Distinct Outcome Predictors in 8341 Untreated People Recruited from 12 Populations.

Blood Pressure Load Does Not Add to Ambulatory Blood Pressure Level for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification

Longitudinal Change in Blood Pressure is Associated with Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in a Chinese Cohort.

Abstract 16532: Impact of Systolic Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Disease in a Chinese Population: A Mendelian Randomization Study

AMBULATORY AND HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISK EVALUATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDIES

Does nondipping blood pressure provide prognostic information for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality independent of nighttime blood pressure?

Diagnostic and prognostic yields of ambulatory blood pressure measurements in haemodialysis patients: a 6-year longitudinal study

Unattended automatic blood pressure measurements versus conventional office readings in predicting hypertension-mediated organ damage

Central Rather Than Brachial Pressures Are Stronger Predictors of Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Longitudinal Prospective Study in a Chinese Population.

Use of Long-term Cumulative Blood Pressure in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Models

Diastolic Blood Pressure J-Curve Phenomenon in a Tertiary-Care Hypertension Clinic

Abstract 11530: Age-Specific Differences Between Conventional and Ambulatory Daytime Blood Pressure Values

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in 9357 Subjects from 11 Populations Highlights Missed Opportunities for Cardiovascular Prevention in Women

A18355 Age- Sex- and Ethnicity-Specific Prediction of Cardiovascular Outcomes by In-Office and Out-of-the-office Blood Pressure

Baseline and Cumulative Blood Pressure in Predicting the Occurrence of Cardiovascular Events

Prognostic Accuracy of Day Versus Night Ambulatory Blood Pressure: a Cohort Study.

Prognostic Value of Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability over 24 H in 8938 Subjects from 11 Populations