Abstract:Proteins play crucial roles, including biocatalysis, transportation, and receptor activity, in living organisms. Moreover, their functional efficacy is influenced by their structural properties. Determining the three-dimensional structure of a protein is crucial to comprehending its catalytic mechanism, identifying potentially beneficial mutations for industrial applications, and enhancing its properties, including stability, activity, and substrate affinity. Although X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and electron microscopy are employed to ascertain protein structures, many researchers have turned to bioinformatics modeling tools because of the high cost and time demands of these techniques. For structure prediction, there are three basic methods: ab initio (de novo), homology-based, and threading-based modeling techniques. In this study, 11 modeling tools belong to different approaches were compared through modeling of various proteins; Geobacillus kaustophilus ksilan alpha-1,2-glucuronidase, Actinosynnema pretiosum bifunctional cytochrome P450/NADPH-P450 reductase, human high affinity cationic amino acid transporter 1 (SLC7A), human proton-coupled zinc antiporter (SLC30A) and Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase sigma factor (sigY). Generated models were validated through QMEAN, QMEANDisCo, ProSA, ERRAT and PROCHECK tools. All of the studied proteins could be successfully modeled using homology modeling techniques, while some of the proteins could not be effectively modeled using threading or ab initio-based methods. YASARA generated reliable models for proteins that contain heteroatoms, such as P450 monooxygenases, because other tools exclude heteroatoms in their produced structures. Among approaches for modeling without templates, AlphaFold is a potent tool. On the other side, well-known template-based tools like YASARA, Robetta, and SWISS-MODEL have arisen. These results will help scientists choose the best protein modeling strategy and tool to guarantee high-quality structures.

Identification Of Functional Surfaces Of Proteins From Sequences

Accuracy of Functional Surfaces on Comparatively Modeled Protein Structures.

Improving Accuracy of Functional Surfaces of Protein Structures Modeled from Sequences

Prediction of Protein Orientation Upon Immobilization on Biological and Nonbiological Surfaces.

SurfPro: Functional Protein Design Based on Continuous Surface

Chapter 4. Predicting and characterizing protein functions through matching geometric and evolutionary patterns of binding surfaces.

Protein 3d Features and Surface Modeling Research

On the Structural Characteristics of the Protein Active Sites and Their Relation to Thermal Fluctuations

PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION: AN IN-DEPTH COMPARISON OF APPROACHES AND TOOLS

The geometric properties of the molecular surfaces of protein crystal structures and AlphaFold predicted models

Functional Geometry Guided Protein Sequence and Backbone Structure Co-Design

Inferring Protein-Protein Interface from Geometry of Unbound Structures

An algorithm to relate protein surface roughness with local geometry of protein exterior shape

Identification of Cavities on Protein Surface Using Multiple Computational Approaches for Drug Binding Site Prediction

Geometric structures of proteins for understanding folding , discriminating natives and predicting biochemical functions

Statistical Survey of Chemical and Geometric Patterns on Protein Surfaces as a Blueprint for Protein-mimicking Nanoparticles

Protein Interface Conservation Across Structure Space

Revealing divergent evolution, identifying circular permutations and detecting active-sites by protein structure comparison

Sequence, Structure and Functional space of proteins

AtomSurf : Surface Representation for Learning on Protein Structures

Comparative surface geometry of the protein kinase family