Statistical Survey of Chemical and Geometric Patterns on Protein Surfaces as a Blueprint for Protein-mimicking Nanoparticles

John M McBride,Aleksei Koshevarnikov,Marta Siek,Bartosz Grzybowski,Tsvi Tlusty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.18.604221

2024-07-19

Abstract:Despite recent breakthroughs in understanding how protein sequence relates to structure and function, considerably less attention has been paid to the general features of protein surfaces beyond those regions involved in binding and catalysis. This paper provides a systematic survey of the universe of protein surfaces and quantifies the sizes, shapes, and curvatures of the positively/negatively charged and hydrophobic/hydrophilic surface patches as well as correlations between such patches. It then compares these statistics with the metrics characterizing nanoparticles functionalized with ligands terminated with positively and negatively charged ligands. These particles are of particular interest because they are also surface-patchy and have been shown to exhibit both antibiotic and anticancer activities – via selective interactions against various cellular structures – prompting loose analogies to proteins. Our analyses support such analogies in several respects (e.g., patterns of charged protrusions and hydrophobic niches similar to those observed in proteins), although there are also significant differences. Looking forward, this work provides a blueprint for the rational design of synthetic nanoobjects with further enhanced mimicry of proteins' surface properties.

Biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is:

Despite significant progress in recent years in understanding the relationship between protein sequences and their structure and function, relatively little attention has been paid to the general characteristics of protein surfaces, especially those regions not involved in binding and catalytic activities. This paper systematically investigates the geometric and chemical patterns of protein surfaces, quantifying the size, shape, and curvature of positively/negatively charged and hydrophobic/hydrophilic surface patches, as well as the correlations between these patches. These statistics are then compared with the characteristics of nanoparticles functionalized with positively and negatively charged ligands. These nanoparticles exhibit antibiotic and anticancer activity due to their surface patchy characteristics, prompting comparisons with proteins. The findings support this analogy; for example, the patterns of charged protrusions and hydrophobic depressions on nanoparticle surfaces are similar to those on proteins, but there are also significant differences. Future work aims to provide a blueprint for designing synthetic nano-objects with enhanced mimicry of protein surface properties.