Abstract:Objective:To compare and analyze the calcification characteristics and diagnostic efficiency of different breast lesion types using digtal breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).Methods:Totally 1 263 patients who underwent both DBT and FFDM at the same time from January 2015 to December 2018 in Dahua Hospital, Xuhui district, Shanghai were analyzed retrospectively. Benign and malignant calcification should be confirmed by pathology or a follow-up of 24 months or more using mammography, and the results of DBT and FFDM were taken as a gold standard. The detection rate and diagnostic efficiency of different types of benign and malignant breast calcification with the two methods were compared and analyzed. The detection rate of morphology and distribution of malignant calcification were compared among groups.Results:There were 240 cases with non-dense breast including 56 cases with benign calcification and 13 cases with malignant calcification. Meanwhile, there were 1 023 cases with dense breast, including 356 cases with benign calcification and 63 cases with malignant calcification. In the cases of non-dense breast, the detection rates of benign calcification by DBT and FFDM were 22.9% (55/240) and 21.7% (52/240), whereas the rates of malignant calcification were 5.0% (12/240) and 4.6% (11/240), all without statistically significances（χ2=0.108, 0.046, P>0.05). No significant differences were observed in the morphology and distribution of malignant calcification detection rates ( P>0.05). In the cases of dense breast, the benign calcification detection rates by DBT and FFDM were 34.2% (350/1 023) and 31.9% (326/1 023), whereas the detection rates of malignant calcification were 6.0% (61/1 023) and 4.9% (50/1 023), all without statistically significances (χ2=1.273 and 1.153, P>0.05). DBT detected more cases of amorphous and cluster distribution of malignant calcification than FFDM, with statistically significant differences (χ2=12.921 and 11.667, P<0.05). The area under ROC curve of DBT and FFDM in diagnosis of non-dense breast were 0.993 and 0.992, and 0.987 and 0.964 in dense breast, respectively, with no significant differences ( Z= 0.136 and 1.391, P>0.05). Conclusions:Compared with FFDM, DBT shows no statistical difference in the diagnostic efficiency of breast calcification. However, it has certain advantages in detecting malignant, amorphous, and clustered calcification in dense breast. DBT has a potential to improve the accuracy of BI-RADS classification of breast calcification.

Evaluation of Breast Cancer Signs with Digital Mammography

Diagnostic Evaluations of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Mammary Duct Ectasia and Breast Cancer

Study of the Relationship of Breast Micro-calcifications and Breast Carcinoma

The Diagnostic Strategy of Small Breast Cancer by Mammography

Evaluation of digital mammography in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer

Diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis by digital mammography in breast cancer

Application of Ultrasonographic Score Evaluation System in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Mass Lesions:Comparison with Pathological Data

Diagnostic Value of Full-Field Digital Mammography for Breast Carcinoma

Clinical value of mammography in diagnosis and identification of breast mass

Correlation Between Mammographic Signs and Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Microvessel Density(MVD) in Breast Cancer

BI-RADS CATEGORIZATION AND POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES

Development and validation of a model for predicting malignant probability of asymmetries signs of BI-RADS category 4 or 5 in mammography

A comparative study of mammographic features of mammography and ER, PR and HER2 expression in breast cancer subtypes

The Differential Diagnostic Value of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images in Breast Disease

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Diagnosis of Dense Breast Lesions

Clinical study of digital mammography, contrast-enhanced MRI as well as their combination in the diagnosis of breast cancer

Efficiency of the detection and diagnosis of calcification in breast lesions by digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography

The Diagnostic Value of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Non-Calcified Malignant Breast Lesions Showed on Mammography: Comparison with Histopathology

Evaluation of the peritumoral features using radiomics and deep learning technology in non-spiculated and noncalcified masses of the breast on mammography

Correlation analysis between mammographic features and different molecular subtypes of breast cancer