Influence of Different Volume Replacement Strategies on Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome after Cardiopulmonary Bypass

刘慧丽,苗齐,曹丽华,罗爱伦,黄宇光
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-5805.2007.02.004
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of hydroxyethylstarch(HES 130/0.4)on systemic inflammatory response syndrome(SIRS)after cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB)with gelofusine(MFG) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG). Methods Twenty-three patients scheduled for selective CABG were randomized to receive either HES 130/0.4 (n=12,groupⅠ) or MFG (group Ⅱ,n=11) as prime solution and volume replacement. Fluid therapy was given perioperatively and continued for 48 h after operation. The incidence of SIRS was recorded. The serum concentrations of C-reactive protein(CRP),interleukin (IL)-6,P-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) were measured after induction of anesthesia,at the end of CPB,as well as 2 h,24 h and 48 h after the end of CPB for both groups. Results Biometric and perioperative data of two groups were similar. There was no marked difference in the number of patients suffering from SIRS. At 24 h and 48 h after CPB,CRP levels were increased in two groups,but the difference was statistically significant only at 48 h between the two groups (P0.05). The concentration of P-selection rose in two groups at the end of CPB and continued to increase during the first 2 postoperative days without significant difference between the two groups. Serum concentrations of ICAM-1 were significantly higher in two groups at 24 h and 48 h after the end of CPB than those after induction,particularly at 48 h in group Ⅱ. Plasma IL-6 levels were elevated above the preoperative levels and there was not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusion Compared to MFG,volume replacement with HES 130/0.4 may reduce the inflammatory response in patients undergoing CABG surgery,resulting from reduced endothelial activation and endothelial damage induced by HES 130/0.4.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?