Abstract:Abstract Principles form part and parcel of our law and legal discourse, so much so that we seldom think of what they are and what they entail. For centuries they have been invoked daily to interpret and argue about the law. But when it comes to matters of constitutional law, principles are further called upon to perform a perennially controversial function: to help police the boundaries of state action. In most common law jurisdictions with a written constitution, this function of principles runs against the generally accepted view that the exercise of judicial review must ultimately be governed and restricted by the terms of the national constitution. This Article argues that the exercise of judicial review based on principles is not confined to that view, once the relationship between principles and the constitution is unpacked and recontextualized. While the English-language literature on principles over the past half-century has been dominated by a select group of Anglo-American scholars, there is a wealth of untapped insights from other parts of the world. One of the major contributions by continental legal theorists even predates the earliest modern Anglo-American writings on the subject by more than a decade. Overall, the law literature in common law and civil law systems reveals a significant degree of commonalities in the basic characters of principles despite the absence of initial evidence of transsystemic borrowings. The wider conceptual inquiry also displays a shift in the focus of the debate, from the protracted search for a clear-cut distinction between rules and principles towards a redefinition of principles’ relationship with “written” law, be it in the form of a civil code or a constitutional instrument. From this inquiry reemerge “unwritten” principles not deriving from codified or legislated law although they have been used to develop the law. Translated into the constitutional domain, these unwritten principles bear no logical connection with the terms of the constitution. Their main functions cover the entire spectrum from serving as interpretive aids to making law by filling gaps. The theoretical framework fits with an ongoing four-century-old narrative of the evolution of constitutional principles and judicial review across most common law-based systems. Constitutional principles are another area where Anglo-American law and legal discourse is less exceptional and more universal than what many assume. Throughout modern Western history, legal battles have been fought and ensuing developments have been made on the grounds of principles. Our law and jurisprudence remain based on them.

The “spirit” of Montesquieu

Montesquieu and China

A Reinterpretation of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the Issue of “Citizen Will”

"Republic Factor" in Confucian Political Philosophy——On Comparative Researches of Chinese and Western Philosophy and Culture from Montesquieu

On Society of Law

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

Reflections on the Concept of “Law” of Shang Yang from the Perspective of Political Philosophy: Function, Value, and Spirit of the “Rule of Law”

On the Road to Chinese Characteristic Socialist Rule of Law

A Debate on the Probability of Constitutional Government in Modem China

Regime-Centered and Court-Centered Understandings: the Reception of American Constitutional Law in Contemporary China†

The Boundary Tablet Marking the Intellectual Province of Constitutional Law——A Dialogue about the Constituent Power between a Political Scientist and a Constitutional Legal Scholar

Against the Holistic Temptations

Legal Principles, Constitutional Principles, and Judicial Review

A sociosemiotic approach to fundamental rights in China

From "people's Sovereignty" to "human Right"--Vicissitude of Study Mode of Science of Constitution in China

The study on some aspects of the rule of constitutional law

An Historical Perspective on the Constitution of Contemporary Chinese Political Culture

Regime-Centered and Court-Centered Understandings: the Reception of American Constitutional Law in Contemporary China

Nature of Liberty

Is Constitution Law?

On the Three Components of the Paradigm of Huaxia Doctrine International Relations