Improved Beam Stability and Increased Dose Rate for Low Dose, High Contrast Megavoltage Cone Beam CT

M. Lu,D. Sawkey,O. Morin,M. Aubin,B. Faddegon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1370

2009-01-01

Abstract:The imaging beam line (IBL) uses an unflattened 4 MV beam from a graphite target to produce superior megavoltage cone beam CT (MVCBCT) images comparing to the 6 MV treatment beam. Clinically useful images are obtained with patient doses of 1 cGy and lower. A diamond target can be used with the more stable, higher efficiency treatment beam energy and run at higher dose rates without water cooling. The quality of phantom and patient images acquired with the diamond target at both beam energies was assessed and compared to those from the graphite target and the treatment beam. The linac was equipped to use either a tungsten, graphite, or diamond target for imaging. The linac was operated at 6 MV with the tungsten target with flattener in place, 4 MV with graphite (unflattened) and both energies with diamond (unflattened). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was determined from MVCBCT images taken from a Siemens Oncor linac. A water phantom of 15cm diameter was imaged with eight different tissue equivalent cylindrical inserts. Several patients were imaged, including head, neck, thorax, and pelvis for the four configurations and at different exposures. CNR measured with the phantom were nearly the same with the diamond target and the graphite target when both were operated at 4 MV. CNR with the diamond target at 6 MV was 5% to 20% less than those at 4 MV for the dense bone. Sagittal images of a head and neck patient with 5 cGy exposure showed much better quality from IBL (4MV graphite), comparing to the images from the treatment beam (6MV tungsten), particularly evident in the vertebrae. Images from another head patient with 2 cGy exposure were acquired with 4 MV (graphite and diamond target) and 6MV (diamond target only) beam. At 4 MV, the diamond target image was better than the graphite target image due to fewer scattering artifacts, and spatial resolution was better, with a comparable CNR. At 6 MV with the diamond target, there were even fewer artifacts but the CNR was reduced. The diamond target provides a new alternative to the graphite target for the IBL with improved beam stability and higher dose rate with comparable image quality.